摘要
值班律师制度因覆盖面广、服务便捷等优势成为认罪认罚从宽制度的配套措施,尽管刑事诉讼法修正案通过后其适用范围不再局限于认罪认罚案件,但仍是认罪认罚案件中律师参与的重要组成部分。从其功能定位来看,值班律师无法满足认罪认罚案件中保障被追诉人认罪认罚自愿性和明智性的要求,两者之间并非天然适配,认罪认罚案件过多地依赖值班律师会引发极大的风险。通过赋予值班律师相应的权利或者将认罪认罚案件完全纳入传统法律援助的范畴均面临困境。当前,为实现法律援助服务质量和数量的平衡,应将值班律师在认罪认罚案件中的适用限于可能判处3年有期徒刑以下刑罚的案件,其他认罪认罚案件中的律师参与借助传统的刑事法律援助实现。
Due to its extensive coverage and convenient service,the duty lawyer system has become a supporting measure for leniency system of guilty plea.Though no longer limited to the cases of pleading guilty with the Criminal Procedure Law Amendment,it still plays an important part in such cases.Judged from its function in China,the duty lawyer cannot meet the requirements of voluntary and rational criminal suspects and defendants in confession,which means it does not fit the leniency system of guilty plea,and excessive reliance on the duty lawyer can be extremely risky.There is a dilemma between giving duty lawyers appropriate rights or fully incorporating pleading guilty cases into the traditional legal aid.In order to balance between the quality and quantity of legal aid,duty lawyers should be limited to cases of leniency system of guilty plea in which the defendants are sentenced to less than three years’imprisonment,and traditional legal aid lawyers should be involved in other cases.
作者
褚晓囡
CHU Xiao-nan(College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2019年第10期78-85,96,共9页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
值班律师
认罪认罚从宽
功能定位
适配性
duty lawyer
leniency system of guilty plea
function of duty lawyer
suitability
