期刊文献+

碳税政策下港口与船舶减排决策的博弈分析 被引量:9

Game Analysis of Port and Ship Decisions on Emission Reduction Under Carbon Tax Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球碳税政策和客户群体绿色偏好的背景下,以港航供应链上下游参与主体为例,从港口和船舶的管理角度出发,研究港航供应链上下游参与主体碳减排过程中的影响因素,分别建立集中、分散两种决策情形下港口企业和船公司的碳减排决策博弈模型,探究不同博弈模型下港航企业在碳减排方面的决策,并分析不同参数对于关键变量的影响。研究结果表明:在集中决策情形下,港航企业以及客户群体的利益可以达到最优目标;其次,政府对港区征收碳税的举措以及客户群体绿色意识的提高,都会促进港口方和船方的减排力度。 Under the background of global carbon tax policy and the green preference of customer group, this paper takes the upstream and downstream participation subjects of the port and air supply chain as an example, studies the influence factors in the carbon emission reduction process of the upstream and downstream of the port supply chain from the point of view of port and ship management, the game models of carbon emission reduction of port enterprises and shipping companies are established under the condition of centralized and decentralized decision-making, the decision-making of carbon emission reduction of port and shipping enterprises under different game models is explored, and the influence of different parameters on key variables is analyzed. The results show that the interests of port and shipping enterprises and customer groups can achieve the optimal goal under the condition of centralized decision-making. Secondly, the measures of the government to impose carbon tax on port areas and the improvement of green awareness of customer groups will promote the emission reduction of port and ship parties.
作者 桑高峰 孟燕萍 Sang Gaofeng;Meng Yanping(Logistics Science and Engineering Research Institute,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第21期227-235,共9页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 上海市社会科学基金面上项目“港航绿色供应链碳减排契约协调机制”(2017BGL015)
关键词 碳税 低碳偏好 港口 船舶 博弈论 carbon tax low carbon preference port ship game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献122

  • 1付慧姝.论我国环境税立法的基本原则[J].江西社会科学,2012,32(4):143-146. 被引量:8
  • 2汪贤裕,杨学南,王华.营销代理商与企业的营销活动分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(5):55-60. 被引量:4
  • 3胡剑锋,颜扬.《碳税政策效应理论研究评述》,《经济理沦与经济管理》20l1年第2期.
  • 4贾康,王桂娟.《以税制绿化和碳税开启新一轮中国环境税制改革》,《中国经济时报》2009年11月9日.
  • 5乔晗,李自然.《碳税政策国际比较与效率分析》,《管婵评论》2010年第6期.
  • 6Anger, N. ( 2008 ), Emissions trading beyond Europe : link- ing schemes in a post-Kyoto world, Energy Economies 30 ( 4 ).
  • 7Babiker,M.H. (2005),Climate change policy, market struc- ture and carbon leakage, Journal of International Economics 65 (2).
  • 8Barker, T. and J. Kohler( 1998), Equity and ecotax reibrm in the EU : Achieving a 10 percent reduction in CO2 emissions us- ing excise duties, Fiscal Studies, 19 (4).
  • 9Bruvoll,A. and B. Larsen (2004) , Greenhouse gas emis- sions in Norway:do carbon taxes work'? , Energy Policy, 32(4).
  • 10Burtraw, D. et al. (2003) , Ancillary Benefits of Reduced Air Pollution in the US from Moderate Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies in the Electricity Sector, Journal of Environmental Eco- nomics and Management, 45 (3).

共引文献108

同被引文献70

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部