期刊文献+

法规范视野下监察与司法程序衔接机制——以《刑事诉讼法》第170条切入 被引量:34

The Cohesive Mechanism between the Supervisory Committee and the Judicial Organ from the Perspective of Legal Rules——Starting from Article 170 of the Criminal Procedure Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 《刑事诉讼法》第170条规定了监察与司法的部分衔接程序。其中,立案程序的缺失导致强制措施的启动缺乏正当性,不利于当事人的权利保障和诉讼程序运转的自洽。未来的司法解释中应确立"形式立案",即以受案代替立案,对监察机关移送的案件不再进行立案前的实质审查,但须明确受案具有开启刑事诉讼程序的功能。在留置与强制措施的衔接上,立法采用了"留置+先行拘留+强制措施"的模式,其中先行拘留具有过渡性,逮捕、取保候审或监视居住才是对接留置的最终措施。但立法上对于留置转先行拘留后最终可否不采取任何强制措施缺乏周延规定。依据案件系属理论,对于审查起诉阶段退回补充调查的情形,系属关系并未消灭,案件仍系属于检察院,处于审查起诉阶段,对犯罪嫌疑人应当继续沿用之前的强制措施,并继续保障辩护人的相关诉讼权利。 Article 170 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates part of the procedures for the connection between supervision and justice. Among them,the lack of case-filing procedures leads to the lack of legitimacy of the initiation of compulsory measures,which is not conducive to the protection of parties’ rights and the self-consistency of the litigation procedure operation. In the future,judicial interpretation should establish "formal filing",replacing the case filing with case accepting. The criminal cases transferred by the supervisory committee should not be subject to the substantive review before filing,while the cases accepting should have the function of opening criminal proceedings. In terms of the connection between lien and compulsory measures,the legislation adopts the mode of"lien-detention de bene esse-compulsory measures",in which the detention de bene esse is a transitional measure,while the arrest,guaranteed pending trial and residential surveillance are the final measures connecting with the lien. However,there is a lack of stipulation about whether compulsory measures could be avoided after the lien is transferred into the detention de bene esse. According to the theory of litigation dependency,during the stage of review and prosecution,the litigation dependency will not be eliminated when the case is returned for supplementary investigation. The case will still belong to the procuratorate and remain in the stage of review and prosecution. The previous compulsory measures for the criminal suspects should be remain applied,and the relevant litigation rights of the defenders should remain protected.
作者 董坤 Dong Kun(the Prosecution Institute of Supreme People’s Procuratorate)
出处 《国家检察官学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期128-141,共14页 Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“立法规范下监察与司法的衔接机制研究”(19BFX100) 2019年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究所一般课题“立法规范下监察调查与刑事司法衔接机制研究”(JL2019J08)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 监察 刑事立案 留置 强制措施 案件系属 Supervision Criminal Case Filing Lien Compulsory Measures Litigation Dependency
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献65

  • 1吕萍.刑事立案程序的独立性质疑[J].法学研究,2002,24(3):142-150. 被引量:68
  • 2陈卫东.我国检察权的反思与重构——以公诉权为核心的分析[J].法学研究,2002,24(2):3-19. 被引量:382
  • 3邱文华.试析纪检口供的证据效力[J].河北法学,2005,23(11):100-102. 被引量:15
  • 4[德]克劳思·罗科信著.《刑事诉讼法》.吴丽琪.法律出版社,2003年版,第5页.
  • 5[日]松尾浩也.《日本刑事诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社,2005年版,第42页.
  • 6黄东熊 吴景芳.《刑事诉讼法论》[M].台湾三民书局,2002年版.第105-106页.
  • 7[苏]切里佐夫著:《苏维埃刑事诉讼》,法律出版社1955年版,第197页.
  • 8中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心组织编译:《英国刑事诉讼法(选编)》,中国政法大学出版社2001年1月版,第239页-397页, 第549页-577页,第504页
  • 9刑事诉讼法第86条.
  • 10[德]克劳斯·罗科信.《刑事诉讼法》,吴丽琪译,法律出版社2004年版,第354页.

引证文献34

二级引证文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部