摘要
为深入挖掘与探讨论文评价指标的学科差异性,文章将社会科学与自然科学领域的九种学科做对比,选择学科综合性期刊PLOS ONE高被引论文的PLOS使用指标、Scopus引用指标、Twitter讨论指标为例,进行实证研究.一方面,探讨九种学科领域的学术论文使用、引用、讨论指标数值特征;另一方面,观察九种学科领域的学术论文使用、引用、讨论指标随时间变化的及时性、波动性、持续性特征,发现不同学科的指标数据动态变化规律.最后,根据不同学科的指标数值特征与动态变化规律,提出基于学科差异的学术论文影响力评价方法,以弱化各学科的指标特征差异.
In order to evaluate the quality and influence of papers in different disciplines fairly and objectively,thispaper compares the nine disciplines in the field of social sciences and natural sciences,and taking the PLOS usage indi-cator,Scopus citation indicator,and Twitter discussion indicator of the comprehensive journal of PLOS ONE,as exam-ples to conduct empirical research.On the one hand,it discusses the use,citation,and discussion index of numericalcharacteristics of academic papers in nine subject areas.On the other hand,it observes the timeliness,volatility,andsustainability of the usage,citation,and discussion of indicators in nine subject areas over time,and discovers the dy-namic changes of indicator data in different disciplines.Finally,according to the numerical characteristics and dynam-ics of different disciplines,the indicators applicable to each subject are selected,and the evaluation methods of aca-demic papers based on disciplinary differences are proposed,to reduce differentia between different disciplines.
作者
李长玲
刘运梅
牌艳欣
Li Changling;Liu Yunmei;Pai Yanxin(Institute of Science and Technical Information,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,255049)
出处
《情报资料工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期23-29,共7页
Information and Documentation Services
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“跨学科潜在知识生长点识别与创新趋势预测研究”（编号：19ATQ006）的研究成果之一
关键词
学科差异
使用指标
引用指标
讨论指标
动态变化特征
影响力评价
disciplinary differences
usage indicator
cited indicator
discussion indicator
dynamic change characteristics
impact evaluation
