摘要
目的对比分析宫禁糜烂使用甲硝唑、奥硝唑治疗的临床疗效。方法选取2018年1月至2018年12月我院妇科收治的86例宫颈糜烂患者,随机分为对照组43例和观察组43例,两组患者都采用微波仪的治疗,另外对照组采用甲硝唑治疗,观察组采用奥硝唑治疗,观察两组患者的治疗效果和用药的安全性。结果观察组治疗之后的临床效果明显优于对照组,组间数据检验结果有显著差异,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论甲硝唑与奥硝唑都可用于治疗宫颈糜烂中,但是奥硝唑的治疗性更强,可使患者快速恢复,同时用药的安全性高,在符合自身病症的条件下可以优先的考虑。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of metronidazole and ornidazole in the treatment of uterine erosion. Methods From January 2018 to December 2018, 86 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into control group(43 cases) and observation group(43 cases). The two groups were treated with microwave instrument. The control group was treated with metronidazole, while the observation group was treated with Ornidazole contusion. The therapeutic effect and safety of the two groups were observed. Results The clinical effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. There was a significant difference in the data between the groups, P<0.05, which was statistically significant. Conclusion Metronidazole and ornidazole frustration can be used in the treatment of cervical erosion, but ornidazole frustration is more therapeutic, can make patients recover quickly, while the safety of medication is high, in line with their own conditions can be given priority.
作者
卡希拉·哈孜尔别克
Kaxila·Hazierbieke(Kazakh Medical Hospita,Altai,Xinjiang 836500)
出处
《智慧健康》
2019年第31期173-174,共2页
Smart Healthcare
关键词
宫颈糜烂
甲硝唑
奥硝唑
临床效果
应用
Cervical erosion
Metronidazole
Ornidazole
Clinical effect
Application
