摘要
行政自制中诸如政府责任清单、行政裁量基准、行政评价等信息工具的运用,本质上是行政伦理的柔性制度化,契合良法善治的理念。这种柔性制度化的"可能"与"限度"需在法理上予以阐释。在"可能"的意义上,需回答行政自制缘何需要信息工具以及信息工具如何可能。信息工具的功能在于经由规范化体系达到柔性的自我控权,因此能迂回消解行政自我规制的诸多悖论。为实现柔性自我控权,在一定程度上解决信息不完全和信息不对称的问题,信息工具须经由微观层面的"规则之治"与宏观层面的"科层体系"之双重规范化。在"限度"的意义上,需厘清信息工具的功能限度止于何处,并且进一步探索在一定程度上突破限度的路径。信息工具的功能限度在于其规范化面临双重困境:重要事实未充分规范化,某些信息工具的规范性过弱;已作了规范的,未充分回应更多事实,某些信息工具的规范性过强。为化解双重困境,需寻求信息工具的功能再造,主要包括功能内向凝集维度上的"事实的深度规范化"与功能外向延展维度上的"增强规范对事实的回应性"。
In order to make nomological interpretation of information tools such as the list of government responsibilities, the standard for administrative discretion, and administrative evaluation in administrative self-restraint, it is necessary to make a detailed inquiry into the possibility and limitation. In the sense of the possibility, it is necessary to answer the question that why information tools are needed in administrative self-restraint and how information tools are possible. The function of information tools is to achieve flexible self-control through the normalization system, so it could deviously dispel numerous paradoxes of administrative self-restraint. To realize flexible self-restraint and solve the problems of incomplete information and information asymmetry to some extent, information tools should be doubly normalized through " rule of norms" at micro-level and "hierarchical system" at macro-level. In the sense of the limitation, it is necessary to clarify the limitation of the functions of information tools, and furthermore explore the approach to go beyond the limitation to some extent. The limitation of the functions of information tools is that their normalization confronts double predicaments: the difference in the degree of normalization lead to the functions of some information tools being limited due to insufficient normalization;the normalization of information tools is faced with the typical conflict between " norms and facts". In order to break through and go beyond the double predicaments, it is necessary to seek the functional reconstruction of information tools, which mainly includes the " deep normalization of facts" on the dimension of internal concentration of functions and the "enhancement of the normative response to facts" on the dimension of external expansion of functions.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第12期65-77,共13页
Political Science and Law
基金
2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“法经济学视角下企业社会责任(CSR)法律化的规则体系建构研究”(项目编号:19YJC820068)
广东省普通高校省级基础研究重大项目“国家治理体系现代化视阈中的政府责任研究”(项目编号:2017WZDXM031)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
行政自制
行政伦理
信息工具
规则之治
科层体系
Administrative Self-restraint
Information Tools
Rule of Norms
Hierarchical System
