摘要
研究了合作式和分散式决策的三种渠道权力结构下低碳供应链的减排策略问题,比较了各种情况下减排、定价和利润的差异,并运用二部定价契约探讨了不同渠道权力结构下低碳供应链的协调方法。研究表明:供应链各方在MSC和NSC结构下的合作的确会导致较高的减排水平,RS结构比RSC结构更有利于减排,但三种合作情形的消费者为获得低碳产品比分散式决策需要支付更高的价格;制造商的利润在分散式决策情形优于合作情形,而零售商和供应链利润却因渠道权力结构的不同而相应不同;减排因子增加会导致分散式决策和合作式决策下的减排水平、定价和利润都下降,而消费者低碳偏好的增加却对减排水平、定价和利润有积极的作用。最后,通过数值分析验证了减排因子和消费者低碳偏好对不同渠道权力结构的减排、定价和供应链利润等决策的影响。
This paper studies the carbon-emission reduction policy problem of low-carbon supply chain under three channel power structures of cooperative and decentralized decision-making. The carbon emission reduction,pricing and profits are compared,and the twopart tariff contract is applied to discuss the coordination of low-carbon supply chains. The results show that the cooperative policy manufacturer Stackelberg and Nash have a higher level of low carbonization than the decentralized channel value while retailer Stackelberg has a lower level of low carbonization,but consumers need to pay higher prices for low-carbon products. At the same time,we find that the manufacturer’s profit in decentralized decision is better than the cooperative decision case,however,retailer’s and supply chain’s profits are different due to the different channel power structure. The increase of emission reduction factors will lead to the reduction of emission reduction,pricing and profit under decentralized decision-making and cooperative decision-making,while consumer preference for low carbon is the opposite. Finally,the influence of the emission reduction factors and low-carbon preference on the carbon emission reduction,the pricing,and profit of the supply chain in different decision structures are verified by numerical analysis.
作者
李友东
夏良杰
王锋正
支华炜
Li Youdong;Xia Liangjie;Wang Fengzheng;Zhi Huawei(School of Business Administration,Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics,Hohhot 010070;School of Business,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222;School of Economics and Management,Inner Mongolia University,Hohhot 010021;School of Management,Tianjin Polytechnic University,Tianjin 300387)
出处
《管理评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第11期240-254,共15页
Management Review
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(71502123,71563033)
教育部创新团队发展计划项目(IRT_16R41)
内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2018MS07016)
内蒙古大学高层次人才科研启动项目(135144)
关键词
低碳供应链
渠道权力结构
减排策略
协调
博弈论
low-carbon supply chain
channel powers structure
carbon emission policy
coordination
game theory
