期刊文献+

族群分离运动为什么会发生?——基于过程论的分析视角 被引量:6

Why Does Ethnic Secession Movement Occur?:An Analysis from the Perspective of Process Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 族群分离运动是全球性的政治与社会运动,对这一问题发生机制的讨论已经成为西方政治学界的重要议题。已有的研究主要是从地理-安全、制度-体系和攻击-回应三个视角展开的,但缺乏对变量的分析。从分离运动的过程论分析视角出发,可以发现,族群分离运动的产生是国内断裂型制度安排与族群政治组织化相结合的结果,当分离族群与主体族群(中央政府)之间在权力获取、利益共享与权利机会等方面的矛盾难以在现有政治框架内解决时,当分离主义族群政党能够有足够的政治能力去开展分离运动时,分离运动就会产生。 Ethnic secession is a global political and social movement.The actual mechanisms of ethnic secession have become an important topic in western political science.Existing research approaches the topic mainly from the perspectives of geographic-security,institution-system,and attack-response.It does not provide satisfactory analyses of the mechanisms of ethnic secession movements.Notably,it lacks a precise and reliable measure of individual variables.From the perspective of a dynamic and integrative theory,ethnic secession could be seen as a constantly changing interactive process.Ethnic secession is the result of a combination of fractured institutional arrangements and a high degree of organized political organization.The minority group and the majority group(often represented by the central government)usually would conflict in power access,interest sharing,and opportunities for rights.If such conflicts can’t be resolved within the existing political framework,and the minority ethnic group can effectively organize ethnic parties and has enough political capacity to carry out a secession movement,the secession movement will emerge.
作者 周光俊 Zhou Guangjun
出处 《国际政治研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期69-86,6,7,共20页 The Journal of International Studies
基金 国家社科基金后期资助项目“分离运动的政治学:亚齐、魁北克、南苏丹和瑞士的比较分析(项目号:19FZZY002) 国家社科基金重点项目“‘一带一路’沿线国家的族群冲突与中国海外利益的维护研究”(项目号:17AGJ001) 2019年度华东政法大学科学研究项目“族群分离运动的治理与民族国家的建构:基于多案例的比较分析”(项目号:19HZK019)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献40

  • 1高奇琦.从单因解释到多因分析:比较方法的研究转向[J].政治学研究,2014(3):3-17. 被引量:17
  • 2赵鼎新.在西方比较历史方法的阴影下——评许田波《古代中国和近现代欧洲的战争及国家形成》[J].社会学研究,2006(5):213-220. 被引量:20
  • 3胡俊峰,常泓.无党派人士的界定和称谓的历史演变[J].湖北成人教育学院学报,2007,13(2):26-27. 被引量:2
  • 4Rasma Karklins.ETHNOPLURALISM: PANACEA FOR EAST CENTRAL EUROPE?[J].Nationalities Papers.2000(2)
  • 5斯蒂夫·芬顿.《族性》,劳焕强等译,北京:中央民族大学出版社,2009年,第16页.
  • 6Jason Sorens, "The Cross-Sectional Determinants of Secessionism in Advanced Democracies," Comparative Political Studies, Vol.38, No.3, 2005, pp.304-326.
  • 7Crawford Young, "Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity and the African State System," in Francis Deng and I. William Zartman, eds., Conflict Resolution in Africa, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1991.
  • 8Lawrence Anderson, " Federalism and Secessionism: Institutional Influences on Nationalist Politics in Qu6bec," Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol.13, No.2, 2007, pp.187-211.
  • 9威尔·金里卡,著,马莉,等译.《多元文化的公民身份》,北京:中央民族大学出版社2009年版,第259__264页.
  • 10Michael L. Ross, "What Do We Know About Natural Resources and Civil War?" Journal of Peace Re- search, Vol.41, No.3, 2004, pp.337-356.

同被引文献48

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部