摘要
开展不同模式下农村宅基地退出的风险评价及其防范对策研究是合理引导农户退出宅基地的前提条件。基于农户的微观福利视角,构建宅基地退出后的风险识别指标体系,利用福建省晋江市的调研数据,运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法,对不同模式下宅基地退出的风险进行综合评价,探讨并提出对应的防范对策。结果表明:晋江市农村宅基地退出主要有指标置换和资产置换两种模式。总体来看,两种宅基地退出模式的综合风险分值均处于中警级别,两种模式对农户宅基地退出都具有比较较大的影响。政策了解程度在两种模式中均处于重警级别,农户的知情权没有得到切实保障;家庭日常支出和人均居住面积在资产置换模式下处于重警级别。研究表明,不同模式下宅基地退出的基本动机和政策安排存在差异,使其对农户产生的影响有所不同。因此,在宅基地退出过程中应科学设定补偿标准和范围、规范宅基地退出程序和采取差别化的方式来推动农户参与,进而为农户退出宅基地提供针对性的风险防范对策。
Evaluating the risks and exploring the prevention measures of rural residential land withdrawal under different modes are critical to guide rural households to withdraw from residential land rationally. Based on a survey data of farmers in Jinjiang City of Fujian Province, and applying the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation(FCE)method, this paper constructed a residential land withdrawal risk identification index system from the perspective of farmers’ micro welfare to comprehensively evaluate the risks of residential land withdrawal under different modes. Results show that there is two main modes of residential land withdrawal, including index replacement and asset replacement, in Jinjiang City. In general, the comprehensive risk scores of the two modes are both in the middle alert levels. Both of the two modes have great influences on the residential land withdrawal for farmers. Farmers’ understanding degree of policy is at the heavy alert level from the perspectives of the internal indicators of both modes. It is at the level of heavy alert for the internal indexes of household daily expenditure and per capita living area under the mode of asset replacement. This research also finds that there are differences in the basic motivation and institutional arrangement of residential land withdrawal undertwo modes, which have different influences on farmers. To provide targeted risk prevention countermeasures for farmersto withdraw residential land, this paper suggests to raise the compensation standard and scope scientifically, to standardizethe procedure of residential land withdrawal, and to adopt differentiated approaches to promote farmers to participate.
作者
梁发超
林彩云
LIANG Fa-chao;LIN Cai-yun(College of Politics and Public Administration,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou,Fujian 362021,China;Center for Political Development and Public Governance Research,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou,Fujian 362021,China)
出处
《农业现代化研究》
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第6期1011-1020,共10页
Research of Agricultural Modernization
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(19YJA630043)
国家自然科学基金项目(41401210)
华侨大学研究生科研创新能力培育计划资助项目(17013031011)~~
关键词
风险评价
农村宅基地退出
退出模式
模糊综合评价
防范对策
risk evaluation
rural residential land withdrawal
withdrawal modes
fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
prevention measures
