期刊文献+

不同台阵形式对微动探测结果的影响 被引量:20

Influence of Different Array Type on the Results of Microtremor Survey
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在江汉盆地的同一场地分别采用三重圆形、T形及L形3种不同台阵形式进行微动探测观测对比实验,结果表明,3种台阵形式提取到的频散曲线基本一致,但频散图谱能量集中度具有明显的差异。三重圆形台阵频散图谱能量集中度最高,L形、T形台阵在2.0~4.6 Hz频段范围内集中度较高,而在1.2~2.0 Hz频段范围内较分散;相比T形和L形台阵,三重圆形台阵更易于探测到地层分界面附近的波速突变特征,即三重圆形台阵比其他两种台阵形式准确性及可靠性更高。 In the same site of Jianghan basin,three different array forms:triple circular,T-shaped and L-shaped,are used for observation and comparison experiments.The results show that the dispersion curves of the three arrays are basically the same;the energy concentration degree of the three arrays is obviously different.The energy concentration degree of the triple circular arrays is the highest,and the concentration degree of the L-shaped and T-shaped arrays is also higher in the range of 2.0-4.6 Hz.Compared with the T-shaped and L-shaped arrays,the wave velocity contrast of the triple circular arrays near the stratigraphic interface is more obvious;that is,the triple circular arrays is more reliable and accurate than the other two array forms.
作者 李井冈 谢朋 王秋良 虞金鑫 沈雨忆 LI Jinggang;XIE Peng;WANG Qiuliang;YU Jinxin;SHEN Yuyi(Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy,Institute of Seismology,CEA,40 Hongshance Road,Wuhan 430071,China;Xiamen Vanke Co Ltd,859 West-Lianqian Road,Xiamen 361000,China)
出处 《大地测量与地球动力学》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期98-103,共6页 Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金(41572354)~~
关键词 微动探测 SPAC法 台阵形式 地层结构 江汉盆地 microtremor survey SPAC array type stratigraphic structure Jianghan basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献115

共引文献384

同被引文献185

引证文献20

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部