摘要
过往的数次刑事诉讼程序体系改革均无法根本破解“案多人少”难题,需从认罪与否、轻罪与重罪的维度对其展开“双层化”重构。首先,根据被告人认罪与否进行首层分流,不认罪案件适用普通程序审理,认罪案件适用简化程序审理。其次,为了贯彻“慎杀”的刑事政策,可能判处死刑的案件即使认罪也应适用普通程序审理。再次,在简化程序审理中,以可能判处三年有期徒刑为界划分轻罪和重罪,分别适用速裁程序和简易程序审理。最后,刑事诉讼程序体系的重构还需明确不同程序间的转化衔接机制。
The numerous previous reforms of system for criminal procedure failed to settle the problem of"personnel being outnumbered by cases".Efforts need to be made to undertake"double-layer"reconstruction from the perspective of whether-or-not pleading guilty,misdemeanors or felonies.Firstly,the first layer of shunt needs to be carried out on the basis of the defendants'whether-or-not pleading guilty so that not-pleading-guilty cases apply to ordinary procedure trial,while pleading-guilty cases apply to simplified procedure trial.Secondly,in simplified procedure trial,death sentences may well apply to ordinary procedure trial in spite of pleading guilty with a view to implementing criminal policy of"careful killing".Thirdly,sentence for three years'imprisonment possibly serves as the division line for misdemeanors or felonies,which respectively apply to short-cut procedure trial and simplified procedure trial.And lastly,reconstruction of China's system of criminal procedure calls for definite transition linkage mechanism for different procedures.
作者
王志坚
WANG Zhi-jian(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《广西警察学院学报》
2019年第6期27-37,共11页
Journal of Guangxi Police College
关键词
刑事诉讼程序
认罪认罚
简易程序
速裁程序
案件分流
criminal procedure
plead guilty and penalty
simplified procedure
short-cut procedure
case shunting
