期刊文献+

产品类型与赠品关联度对促销评价的影响研究 被引量:4

The Effect of Product Type and Gift Correlation on the Evaluation of Gift Promotion
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于消费者视角,通过实验法探究了产品类型与赠品关联度对促销评价的影响。研究表明:实用品会激发个体的纵向思维,消费者更注重利益最大化,进而对高关联度赠品评价更高;享乐品会激发个体的横向思维,消费者更注重多样化寻求,进而对低关联度赠品评价更高;赠品价格会调节主产品类型对赠品关联度的影响作用。当赠品处于低价格时,上述结论得以重复;然而,当赠品处于高价格时,无论实用品还是享乐品,个体都偏好高关联赠品。 From the perspective of consumers, this paper reveals the effect of product type and gift correlation on the evaluation of gift promotion. Results show that utilitarian product facilitates vertical thinking by holding consumers’ attention on benefit maximization, and higher evaluation of high correlation gift. However, hedonic product facilitates lateral thinking by holding consumers’ attention on variety seeking, and higher evaluation of low correlation gift. Gift’s price has a moderating role of the above effect. That is, such effect only replicated when gift is at relatively low price. However, when the price is high, high correlation gift is always better.
作者 张宇 丁雪超 杜建刚 ZHANG Yu;DING Xue-chao;DU Jian-gang(Business School,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071)
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第12期133-138,共6页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71572082)
关键词 实用品 享乐品 纵向思维 横向思维 赠品促销 utilitarian product hedonic product vertical thinking lateral thinking gift promotion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1韩睿,田志龙.促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(2):85-91. 被引量:92
  • 2孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:148
  • 3Tversky A, Simonson I. Context Dependent Preferences [ J] . Man-agement Science, 1993,39: 1179 - 1189.
  • 4Simonson I. Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction andCompromise Effects [ J] . Journal of Consumer Research, 1989,16(2): 158 -174.
  • 5Pettibone J C,Wedell D H. Examining Models of NondominatedDecoy Effects Across Judgment and Choice [ J] . Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 81 : 300 -328.
  • 6Huber J, Payne J W, Puto C. Adding Asymmetrically DominatedAlternatives : Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis[J] . Journal of Consumer Research,1982,9 ( 1 ) ; 90 -98.
  • 7Sheng S,Parker A M, Nakamoto K. Understanding the Mechanismand Determinants of Compromise Effects [ J] . Psychology & Market-ing, 2005, 22: 591 -609.
  • 8Hedgcock W, Rao A R. Trade - off Aversion as an Explanation forthe Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingStudy [J] . Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46: 1 -13.
  • 9Groner R,Groner M,Bischof W F. Methods of Heuristics [ M] .Citeseer,1993.
  • 10Slovic P. Choice between Equally Valued Alternatives [ J] . Journalof Experimental Psychology ; Human Perception and Performance,1975,1 (3): 280-287.

共引文献24

同被引文献39

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部