摘要
司法实践中对物流人员窃取货物行为的定性混乱,源于对职务侵占罪的职务便利和具体手段的认识分歧。职务侵占罪中的职务便利一般是指单位的工作人员利用其主管、管理、经手等持有本单位财物的便利条件,但职务便利的认定应随着时代、经济发展以及生产运营方式的发展而相应调整,不能排除简单劳务活动带来的职务便利。职务侵占罪的手段行为应包括侵占、盗窃和诈骗等。认定职务便利关键要看行为人是否因工作岗位而实际控制或事实上控制相关财物。
In judicial practice it is very chaotic to verify logistics professionals’act of stealing goods,which originates from difference in understanding convenience and exact methods of professional embezzlement.The convenience of professional embezzlement generally refers to staff members who use convenient conditions in which they are in charge,manage,handle or hold goods of their units.However,the verification of professional embezzlement should be readjusted with the development of the era,economy,production and operation methods and so on.It cannot be excluded that simple manual activities may bring about professional convenience.The methods of professional embezzlement should include embezzlement,theft,fraud and so on.The key to the verification of professional convenience is to see whether actors actually control goods or truly control relevant property.
作者
张勇旦
Zhang Yongdan(People’s Procuratorate of Pudong New District,Shanghai 201299,China})
出处
《上海公安学院学报》
2019年第6期50-55,共6页
Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词
物流
窃取货物
定性
职务侵占
Logistics
Steal Goods
Verify the Nature
Professional Embezzlement
