摘要
"查戈斯群岛咨询案"再次展示了国际法院的咨询管辖权和当事国选择争端解决方式的自由之间的张力。本文通过对当事国同意原则的法律渊源、该原则对维护国家主权权益的积极作用以及平衡国家主权和联合国机构职权这三个角度进行分析,揭示了在咨询程序中坚持当事国同意原则的重要意义:考虑到咨询意见所具有的不容忽视的现实影响力,以及避免诸如恶意利用法院权威、影响争端有效解决和破坏法院司法属性及公信力等问题,法院在咨询程序中仍需考虑适用同意原则,尊重当事国选择争端解决方式的自由。为避免被动陷入法院的咨询管辖权,维护选择争端解决方式的程序性权利,主权国家有必要更积极地考虑如何避免联合国大会做出向国际法院提出咨询请求的决议。
The advisory opinion regarding Chagos Archipelago revealed once again the tension between the advisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and the free choice of means possessed by states in dispute settlement.Three issues are discussed here,namely legal sources of the principle of state consent,the positive role of this principle in maintaining state sovereign interests and the significance of applying this principle in advisory proceedings.Given the remarkable practical influence of advisory opinions and problems such as exploiting the authority of the Court,affecting the effective settlement of disputes and prejudicing the judicial nature of the Court and its credibility,it is well-advised for the Court to respect the free choice of means regarding dispute settlement by applying the principle of state consent in advisory proceedings.In order to avoid getting involved reluctantly in the advisory jurisdiction of the Court and preserve the procedural right of free choice of means in dispute settlement,it seems quite meaningful for states to take active steps in blocking requests for advisory opinions made by UN General Assembly.
出处
《法治社会》
2020年第1期31-38,共8页
Law-Based Society
基金
中山大学2019年度高校基本科研业务费青年教师培育项目“国际法院行使咨询管辖权的适当性问题研究”（项目编号：19wkpy08）支持
关键词
国际法院
咨询程序
当事国同意原则
国家主权权益
International Court of Justice
Advisory Proceedings
Principle of State Consent
State Sovereign Interests
