期刊文献+

二语论元构式习得的发展动态性问题 被引量:1

Dynamics of L2 Argument Construction Learning
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究在基于使用的语言习得观下跟踪调查英语论元构式的动态发展情况。结果显示,论元构式的能产程度具有不均衡特点,发展脉络各异,线性和非线性共存,动态与停滞并现。由此推断,构式特征、内外语言系统的一致性问题和语言认知的归纳-演绎过程影响论元构式的动态发展。这一结果支持基于使用的语言习得观对语言能力发展连续统的假设,"项目习得"-"抽象图式"-"图式在新项目中的使用"之间的循环推动句法能产力的涌现和发展。 By drawing upon usage-based approach to language learning, the study examines the developmental issues of English argument constructions in a longitudinal research paradigm. Results show productive variance and different developmental patterns of argument constructions, co-existence of linear and non-linear developmental paths, and co-occurrence of dynamics and statics of argument construction learning. It is suggested that structural features, inconsistency between inner and outer language systems, and inductive and deductive learning co-influence development of argument constructions. The results provide support to the continuum hypothesis of usage-based approach to language learning. The cycling process of item-based language learning, schema-abstracting and extension of the schema to new items facilitates the emergence of syntactic competence.
作者 徐承萍 XU Chengping(English Department,Foreign Languages School,Tianjin Normal University,Xiqing District,Tianjin 300387,P.R.China)
机构地区 天津师范大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期69-80,共12页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目“二语学习者的动词句法认知凸显研究”(18YJCZH207)的阶段性成果 北京外国语大学“北京市高精尖学科‘外语教育学’建设项目”支持
关键词 基于使用的语言习得 论元构式 动态发展 句法特征 usage-based approach to language learning argument construction dynamic development syntactic features
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献104

  • 1何文忠.中动结构的界定[J].外语教学,2005,26(4):9-14. 被引量:105
  • 2Bock,K.1986.Syntactic persistence in language production[J].Cognitive Psychology18:355-387.
  • 3Bock,K.&Z.Griffin.2000.The persistence of structural priming:Transient activation or implicit learning?[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:General129:177-192.
  • 4Bock,K.&H.Loebell.1990.Framing sentences[J].Cognition35:1-39.
  • 5Branigan,H.,M.Pickering&A.Cleland.2000.Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue[J].Cognition75:13-25.
  • 6Branigan,H.,M.Pickering,J.McLean&A.Cleland.2007.Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue[J].Cognition104:163-197.
  • 7Chang,F.,G.Dell&K.Bock.2006.Becoming syntactic[J].Psychological Review113:234-272.
  • 8Chang,F.,G.Dell,K.Bock&Z.Griffin.2000.Structural priming as implicit learning:A comparison of models of sentence production[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research29:217-229.
  • 9De Bot,K.1992.A bilingual production model:Levelt’s“Speaking”model adapted[J].Applied Linguistics13:1-24.
  • 10Desmet,T.&M.Declercq.2006.Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information[J].Journal of Memory and Language54:610-632.

共引文献164

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部