期刊文献+

护理学专业学生课程整合态度测评量表的编制 被引量:1

Development of curriculum integration attitude assessment scale for nursing students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制适合测评我国护理院校学生对课程整合态度的量表,并进行信效度检验。方法通过文献回顾法、德尔菲法形成量表初稿。采用方便抽样法,于2018年6—11月选取黑龙江省已进行课程整合的3所护理院校中进入毕业实习阶段的575名学生作为调查对象,测定量表的信效度。结果护理学专业学生课程整合态度测评量表包括3个维度20个条目。总量表的内容效度指数为0.943,各条目的内容效度指数为0.8~1.0。探索性因子分析提取价值倾向、参与倾向、情感倾向3个因子,累计方差解释率为77.602%。总量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.928,各维度Cronbach'sα系数为0.942~0.954。总量表Spearman-Brown系数为0.879,各维度Spearman-Brown系数为0.921~0.933。总量表重测信度系数为0.789,各维度重测信度系数为0.549~0.779。结论护理学专业学生课程整合态度测评量表有良好的信效度,可用于护理专业学生对课程整合态度的评价,为进一步优化课程体系提供科学依据,也可以为类似教学评价提供参考与借鉴。 Objective To develop a curriculum integration attitude assessment scale for students in nursing school of China and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The first draft of scale was developed with the methods of literature review and Delphi technique.From June to November 2018,we selected 575 interns from three nursing schools undergoing curriculum integration in Heilongjiang Province as respondents by convenience sampling.The reliability and validity of this scale were tested.Results The curriculum integration attitude assessment scale for nursing students included three dimensions and 20 items.The content validity index of the total scale was 0.943 and that of items ranged from 0.8 to 1.0.Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors including value tendency,participation tendency and emotional tendency with 77.602%for the cumulative variance contribution.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.928 and that of dimensions ranged from 0.942 to 0.954;the Spearman-Brown coefficient of the total scale was 0.879 and that of dimensions ranged from 0.921 to 0.933;the test-retest reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.789 and that of dimensions ranged from 0.549 to 0.779.Conclusions The curriculum integration attitude assessment scale for nursing students has high reliability and validity which can be used to assess nursing students'attitude with curriculum integration so as to provide a scientific basis for further optimize curriculum system and a reference for similar teaching assessment.
作者 许春娇 朱雪梅 李会仿 隋树杰 林平 芦桂芝 Xu Chunjiao;Zhu Xuemei;Li Huifang;Sui Shujie;Lin Ping;Lu Guizhi(School of Nursing,Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150086,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2020年第1期110-113,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 中华医学会医学教育分会中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年度医学教育研究立项课题(2016B-HL039)。
关键词 学生 护理 课程整合 护理学 量表 Students nursing Curriculum integration Nursing Scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25

共引文献1060

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部