期刊文献+

体素不相干运动与动态对比增强磁共振成像在评估早期宫颈癌淋巴脉管浸润状态中的应用 被引量:10

Clinical value of IVIM MRI and DCE MRI in assessment of lymphovascular space invasion status in early cervical cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·探讨体素不相干运动(intravoxel incoherent motion,IVIM)与动态对比增强(dynamic contrast enhancement,DCE)磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)术前评估早期宫颈癌淋巴脉管浸润(lymphovascular space invasion,LVSI)状态的临床价值。方法·收集早期宫颈癌患者56例,均在术前行IVIM与DCE MRI检查,分别测量癌灶最大径、肌层浸润深度(比例)以及MRI定量参数(IVIM:f、D、D^*;DCE:Ktrans、Kep、Ve)。根据术后病理结果,将病例分为LVSI阳性组与LVSI阴性组,并记录患者年龄、FIGO分期、病理类型和分化程度。比较2组患者基本资料和MRI参数的差异,Logistic回归分析早期宫颈癌发生LVSI的关联因素,受试者操作特征曲线分析这些关联因素用于评估LVSI情况的诊断效能。结果·LVSI阳性组与LVSI阴性组间患者年龄、FIGO分期、病理类型、肿瘤分化程度、肿瘤最大径比较,差异无统计学意义;LVSI阳性组癌灶肌层浸润深度(比例)显著高于LVSI阴性组(P=0.000),而Ktrans值、D^*值显著低于LVSI阴性组(P=0.003,P=0.004);D值、f值、Kep值、Ve值在2组间比较,差异无统计学意义;Logistic回归分析显示肌层浸润深度(比例)和Ktrans值与早期宫颈癌发生LVSI独立相关;两者独立诊断LVSI状态的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)与准确度分别为0.760与75.1%、0.723与71.4%;联合诊断的AUC为0.839,准确度为76.8%;纳入D^*值后三者诊断的AUC为0.874,准确度为87.5%。结论·宫颈癌肌层浸润深度(比例)、Ktrans值有助于术前评估早期宫颈癌LVSI状态,两者进一步联合D^*值可提高其诊断效能。 Objective·To investigate the clinical value of intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM)MRI and dynamic contrast enhancement(DCE)MRI in assessment of lymphovascular space invasion(LVSI)in early cervical cancer patients preoperatively.Methods·Fifty-six patients with early cervical cancer were collected,all of whom underwent preoperative IVIM and DCE MRI.The tumor maximum diameter,the depth ratio of cervical infiltration and the IVIM(f,D and D^*)and DCE(Ktrans,Kep and Ve)MRI quantitative parameters were measured,respectively.According to postoperative pathological results,patients were divided into LVSI positive group and LVSI negative group.Patients’age,International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)stage,pathological type and differentiation degree were also recorded.The difference of basic characteristics and MRI parameters of the two groups was compared.Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of LVSI in early cervical cancer,and the receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve)was applied to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these risk factors of LVSI.Results·There were no significant differences in patients’age,FIGO stage,pathological type,differentiation degree and tumor maximum diameter between LVSI positive group and LVSI negative group.The depth ratio of cervical infiltration in LVSI positive group was significantly higher than that in LVSI negative group(P=0.000),while D^*value and Ktrans value in LVSI positive group were significantly lower than those in LVSI negative group(P=0.003,P=0.004).D value,f value,Kep value and Ve value showed no significant difference between the two groups.Logistic regression analysis showed that the depth ratio of cervical infiltration and Ktrans value were independently correlated with LVSI.The area under the curve AUC and the accuracy of independent diagnosis of LVSI state were 0.760 and 75.1%,0.723 and 71.4%,respectively.The AUC of combined diagnosis was 0.839 and the accuracy was 76.8%.After the inclusion of D^*value,the AUC of the three diagnosis was 0.874,with the accuracy of 87.5%.Conclusion·The depth ratio of cervical infiltration and Ktrans value are helpful for preoperative evaluation of LVSI status in early cervical cancer,and they can improve the diagnostic efficacy when combined with D^* value.
作者 米红兰 程杰军 殷霞 朱莉 林聪 路青 MI Hong-lan;CHENG Jie-jun;YIN Xia;ZHU Li;LIN Cong;LU Qing(Department of Radiology,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China;Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期224-230,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 上海市浦江人才计划(15PJ1405200) 上海交通大学医学院教学项目(888.002.5039.02)。
关键词 宫颈癌 淋巴脉管浸润 体素不相干运动 动态对比增强 cervical carcinoma lymphovascular space invasion(LVSI) intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM) dynamic contrast enhancement(DCE)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈玉平,刘雪琴,蔡德鸿.骨质疏松症知识问卷的信度和效度测定[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2005,11(3):339-341. 被引量:148
  • 2栾荣生.流行病学研究原理与方法[M].第4版.成都:四川大学出版社,2002.114-121.
  • 3Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies [J]. The Statistician, 1983, 32, 307- 317.
  • 4Howell, D. C. Statistical methods for psychology [M]. 2nd ed. Boston: Duxbury Press, 1987.
  • 5金丕焕.医学统计方法[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.436.
  • 6Bland JM, Ahman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J]. Lancet, 1986, 1(8476) : 307-310.
  • 7Michel BeAdard, Nancy J. Martin, Paul Krueger, et al. Assessing Reproducibility of Data Obtained With Instruments Based on Continuous Measurements [J]. Experimental Aging Research. 2000, 26: 353-365.
  • 8J. Lee, D. Koh , C. N. Ong. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Compute [J]. Biol. Med. 1989, 19: 61-70.
  • 9Pitman, E. J. G. A note on normal correlation [J]. Biometrlka, 1939, 31: 9-12.
  • 10Katy Dewittel, Colette Fierens, Dietmar Stockl, et al. Thienpont. Application of the Bland -Altman Plot for Interpretation of Method-Comparison Studies: A Critical Investigation of Its Practice[J]. Clinical Chemistry, 2002, 48: 799-801.

共引文献171

同被引文献124

引证文献10

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部