期刊文献+

两种手术方式治疗T3期肾癌的临床疗效比较

A comparative study on efficacy of two surgery approaches for management of T3 stage large volume renal cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对比分析两种手术方式治疗T3期肾癌的临床效果。方法 选择2015年1月-2018年3月本院收治的80例T3期肾癌患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组(腹腔镜根治术)和对照组(开放根治术)各40例。比较两组患者的手术切口大小、手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复情况、术后并发症、手术切除肿瘤效果等。结果 观察组比对照组具有更小的手术切口、更短的手术时间和较少的术中出血量,术后肛门排气时间和术后住院天数少于对照组(P<0.05)。而两组的手术并发症和1年生存率、肿瘤复发率等方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 两种手术方法治疗T3期肾癌均安全有效,但腹腔镜根治术创伤更小,术后恢复更快。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of two different approaches surgery for management of T3 stage renal cell carcinoma.Methods 80 patients with T3 stage renal cell carcinoma were divided into observation group(laparoscopic radical surgery)and control group(open radical surgery),40 cases in each group.The size of the incision,the operation time,the amount of intraoperative blood loss,the postoperative recovery,postoperative complications and the effect of surgical resection were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group,the observation group had smaller incision size,shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss.Postoperative rehabilitation such as the first anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay were less than the control group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in surgical resection such as 1-year survival rate,tumor recurrence rate(P>0.05).Conclusions The two approaches surgery with the similar effect of T3 stage renal cell carcinoma resection,however,laparoscopic radical surgery with less postoperative trauma and faster recovery.
作者 彭家银 黄长青 高绍青 黎绍冠 PENG Jia-yin(Department of urology,center people hospital of Zhanjiang,Zhanjian,Guangdong,524003,China)
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2019年第24期3073-3075,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 肾癌 腹腔镜 肾癌根治术 Renal cell carcinoma Laparoscopy Radical nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献115

  • 1瓦斯里江.瓦哈甫,李宏召,张旭,马鑫,陈光富,丁强,王保军,郑涛,史涛坪.后腹腔镜肾部分切除术两种不同缝合方式的安全性和预后比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2012,1(1):59-63. 被引量:3
  • 2陆曙炎,陈建国,张焕兴,周忠兴,邹建钢,吴小鹏,陈仰之,陈静,刘伟民,高谷深.后腹腔镜手术治疗泌尿系疾病(附23例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(2):110-112. 被引量:113
  • 3李龙承 张旭主.泌尿外科手术图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.157-158.
  • 4Rebecca Siegel,Deepa Naishadham,Ahmedin Jemal.Cancer statistics, 2013[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2013 (1)
  • 5William C. Huang,Elena B. Elkin,Andrew S. Levey,Thomas L. Jang,Paul Russo.Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Small Renal Tumors—Is There a Difference in Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes?[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2009 (1)
  • 6Brian M. Benway,Sam B. Bhayani,Craig G. Rogers,Lori M. Dulabon,Manish N. Patel,Michael Lipkin,Agnes J. Wang,Michael D. Stifelman.Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2009 (3)
  • 7INDERBIR S. GILL,JOSE R. COLOMBO,IGOR FRANK,ALIREZA MOINZADEH,JIHAD KAOUK,MIHIR DESAI.LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR HILAR TUMORS[J]. The Journal of Urology . 2005 (3)
  • 8William C Huang,Andrew S Levey,Angel M Serio,Mark Snyder,Andrew J Vickers,Ganesh V Raj,Peter T Scardino,Paul Russo.Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Lancet Oncology . 2006 (9)
  • 9Inderbir S. Gill,Manuel S. Eisenberg,Monish Aron,Andre Berger,Osamu Ukimura,Mukul B. Patil,Vito Campese,Duraiyah Thangathurai,Mihir M. Desai.“Zero Ischemia” Partial Nephrectomy: Novel Laparoscopic and Robotic Technique[J]. European Urology . 2010 (1)
  • 10Kopp RP, Mehrazin R, Palazzi KL, et al. Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal turnouts categorised by R. E. N. A. L. nephrometry score [ J]. BJU Int, 2014,114:708-718. DOl:10.1111/bju. 12580.

共引文献331

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部