摘要
近年来,乡村教育的"离农""为农"之争引起了学术界的广泛关注,但作为讨论前提的"离农""为农"概念本身,似乎并没有得到厘清。当前研究多侧重于学校教育内容、学生精神情感取向、学校的当地服务功能、学校空间布局和教育资源配置等不同方面,而这些观点之间却存在着实质性的断裂。出自上位者的"为农"观点并不一定能代表民众的利益和意愿,甚至可能压抑民众的声音,日益凋敝的乡村教育也不可能通过这些"为农"式主张得到拯救。问题的症结不在于"离农"抑或"为农",而是乡村民众的真实意愿是否得到了充分尊重。回归实践,确保乡村学校自主性,才能真正释放乡村教育的活力。
In recent years,the debate of"break away from villages"and"for villages"in rural education has aroused wide attention in the academic circle,but the concept of them as the premise of discussion seems not to have been clarified.At present,researches mainly focus on different aspects,such as school education content,students’spiritual and emotional orientation,school local service function,school space layout and education resource allocation,but there are substantial fractures among these viewpoints.The idea of"for villages"from the upper class does not necessarily represent the interests and wishes of the people,and it may even constitute the suppression of the voice of the people.The increasingly poor rural education cannot be saved by these"for villages"ideas.The crux of the problem is not whether to"break away from villages"and"for villages",but whether the real will of the rural people is fully respected.Only by returning to practice and ensuring the autonomy of rural schools,can only be truly release the vitality of rural education.
作者
徐婉茹
康永久
XU Wanru;KANG Yongjiu(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《现代教育科学》
2020年第2期11-16,60,共7页
Modern Education Science
关键词
乡村教育
离农
为农
文化自主
rural education
break away from villages
for villages
cultural autonomy
