期刊文献+

Mock Impoliteness and Co-Construction of Hudui Rituals in Chinese Online Interaction 被引量:1

汉语网络交际中的虚假不礼貌与互怼仪式共建
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper examines an under-researched phenomenon of mock impoliteness in Chinese online interaction,namely,the practice of hudui(lit.reciprocal jocular abuse)as a solidarity enhancing device among acquaintances.Drawing on data from Qzone interaction among Chinese university students,this study focuses on ritual features,sequential patterns and interpersonal functions of hudui through the lens of Kádár’s(2013,2017)interpersonal ritual theory.The results show that hudui is co-constructed by the online participants with the symmetric pattern of mutual abuse,which distinguishes it from previous studies of jocular abuse(i.e.,the asymmetric pattern of abuser–recipient).They also reveal that hudui accomplishes various kinds of relational work,including fostering intimacy,enhancing mutual affection-based face and creating amusement. "互怼"是一种汉语网络交际中的常见现象,指熟人之间利用虚假不礼貌来增进感情的话语实践,然而学界对其关注甚少。本文基于大学生QQ空间的网络对话语料,结合Kádár(2013,2017)的人际仪式理论,探讨互怼的仪式特征、序列结构及其人际功能。研究发现,互怼由交际者在网络互动中联合共建,体现为"相互侮辱"对称模式,这不同于以往的"侮辱者-接受者"非对称模式,具有增进感情、提升情面和创造娱乐三种人际功能。
作者 Linsen ZHAO 赵林森(广东外语外贸大学英语教育学院)
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2020年第1期45-63,126,共20页 中国应用语言学(英文)
基金 support the Department of Education of Guangdong Province and Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics at Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China, for the project (2018WZDXM006) on the frontier research and theoretical innovations in interpersonal pragmatics the Youth Fund Project (Project No.: 19QN34) of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies the support from the Chinese Ministry of Education Research Project of Humanities and Social Science (Project No.: 16JJD740006) conducted by the Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.
关键词 mock impoliteness hudui rituals CO-CONSTRUCTION Chinese online interaction 虚假不礼貌 互怼仪式 交际共建 汉语网络交际
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1夏中华,曹起.汉语流行语产生途径的考察与分析[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,28(5):78-82. 被引量:18
  • 2Alberts,J. K. An inferential/strategic explanation forsocial explanation of teases [J], Journal of Languageand Social Psychology, 1992(3): 157-177.
  • 3Bousfleld, Derek. Beginnings, middles & ends: abiopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges [J].Journal of Pragmatics, 2007 (39): 2185-2216.
  • 4Bousfield, Derek. Impoliteness in Interaction [M].Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub-lishing Company, 2008.
  • 5Bousfield,Derek & Locher, Miriam, eds. Impolite-ness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Powerin Theory and Practice [C]. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter,2008.
  • 6Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. Polite-ness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cam-bridge :Cambridge University Press,1987.
  • 7Crystal, David. Language and the Internet!M]. Cam-bridge :Cambridge University Press,2006.
  • 8Culpeper, Jonathan. Towards an anatomy of impolite-ness[j]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996(25): 349-367.
  • 9Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wich-mann. Impoliteness revisited: With sepecial referenceto dynamic & prosodic aspects [J]. Journal of Prag-matics, 2003(35): 1545-1579.
  • 10Culpeper, Jonathan. Impoliteness and The WeakestLink [ J ]. Journal of Politeness Research,2005,1 (1):35-72.

共引文献9

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部