摘要
风险社会下的社会风险兼含传统风险与新型风险,应当区分看待其对刑法理论产生的影响。风险社会中的刑法创设了抽象危险犯、预备犯实行化等“风险规范”,它们蕴含着不断膨胀且侵蚀自由的风险。实质解释论可对其处罚范围进行限缩,以防刑法在应对社会风险时失去自身理性。实质解释论以法益为核心指导概念,但法益论自身同样遭遇困境,应当承认实质解释论需要法益发挥一定程度的立法批判机能,指向犯罪实质的法益概念不宜盲目扩张。
The social risk in a risk society contains both traditional and new risks, and their influence on criminal law theory should be distinguished. The criminal law in the risk society creates "risk norms" such as abstract dangerous criminals and preparatory criminals, but they contain the risks of losing restrictions and infringing on freedom. The substantive explanation theory can appropriately limit the scope of punishment to prevent the criminal law from losing its own rationality in dealing with social risks. The substantive explanation theory is guided by the concept of Rechtsgutslehre, but the theory of Rechtsgutslehre itself also encounters difficulties. It should be acknowledged that the theory of substantive explanation requires Rechtsgutslehre to play a certain degree of critical function of legislation, and the concept of Rechtsgutslehre pointing to the essence of crime should not be blindly expanded.
作者
吴宗宪
杨晓庆
WU Zong-xian;YANG Xiao-qing(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2020年第1期24-31,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
风险社会
风险刑法
恐怖主义
实质解释
法益
risk society
risk criminal law
terrorism
substantive explanation
Rechtsgutslehre
