摘要
刑法学界关于犯罪既遂标准有目的实现说、结果发生说、构成要件齐备说、双重标准说、类型化标准说以及法益侵害说等。犯罪既遂标准争论的核心是构成要件齐备说和法益侵害说之争,其他学说或是对构成要件齐备说细枝末节的修补,或是对法益侵害说悄无声息的贴近。构成要件齐备说存在分则既遂模式论的理论前提不真实、混淆“犯罪成立”与“犯罪既遂”关系、缺乏可操作性、既遂类型划分不合理的缺陷,而法益侵害说符合法益保护的立法目的、定罪量刑的视角选择和实行行为的本质要求,并且能够妥当地应对批评者的诘难和实践中的难题,具有理论上的优越性和实践上的可操作性。
The arguments for accomplice of crime include purpose realization,the occurrence of the results,the completeness of the constituent elements,the double standards,types of standard and infringement of legal interests.Among them the completeness of the constituent elements and infringement of legal interests are two major ones.The others will either serve as complementary parts or get close to infringement of legal interests.However,completeness of the constituent elements has the shortcomings of the untrue theoretical premise of Partially Accomplished Model theory,the confusion between the“establishment of a crime”and the“accomplished crime”,lack of operability,and unreasonable classification of the type of the accomplished,while infringement of legal interests is in line with the legislative purpose of legal interests protection,the perspective of conviction and sentencing,and the essential requirements of perpetrating act,and it can properly deal with the criticism over it and practical difficulties,thus it has theoretical advantage and practical operability.
作者
简筱昊
JIAN Xiao-hao(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第1期60-71,共12页
Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金
中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助:“区块链技术应用的刑事风险及其应对——以数字货币洗钱犯罪为视角”(201910706)。
关键词
犯罪既遂
构成要件齐备说
法益侵害说
实害犯
危险犯
accomplice of crime
completeness of the constituent elements
infringement of legal interests
actual crime
dangerous crime
