摘要
检察机关的批捕部门与起诉部门应当合一还是分立,目前学界对此讨论比较多。从结构功能主义角度看,检察机关的审查批捕功能与起诉功能均属于法律维护功能的重要组成部分,检察机关的审查批捕权与起诉权均属于司法权的内容,并无质的区别。如何在捕诉合一与捕诉分立之间进行选择,最需要考虑的因素是这两种模式对审查批捕功能的发挥、权利的保障与职能的专业化的影响。综合权衡,应然的选择是捕诉分立模式。在捕诉合一模式下,应当通过建立有效的司法责任追究机制、确立合理的检察官考核机制,以及设置合理的工作流程等措施,确保审查批捕功能的发挥。
Whether the arrest department and prosecution department of the procuratorial organ should be united or separated has been discussed a lot at present.From the perspective of structural functionalism,the functions of examination and approval of arrest and the functions of prosecution of procuratorial organs belong to important parts of the function of legal protection.The power of examination and approval of arrest and the power of prosecution used by procuratorial organs to realize these two functions belong to the content of judicial power,and there is no qualitative difference.How to choose between the integration of arrest and prosecution and the separation of arrest and prosecution,the most important factor to consider is the impact of these two modes on the function of examination and approval of arrest,the protection of rights and the professionalization of functions.After comprehensive balance,the proper choice is the mode of separation of arrest and prosecution.Under the mode of combining arrest and prosecution,we should ensure that the function of examination and approval of arrest can be brought into full play by establishing an effective mechanism of judicial accountability,establishing a reasonable mechanism of prosecutor assessment and setting up a reasonable workflow.
作者
吴光升
林静
Wu Guangsheng;Lin Jing(Zhijiang College, Zhejiang University of Technology, Shaoxing 312030,China;School of Law, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023,China)
出处
《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第3期41-50,共10页
Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
最高人民检察院检察理论一般课题“检察职权范围调整与检察院组织法修改——一种功能主义的分析”(GJ2014C19)。
关键词
结构功能主义
捕诉合一
捕诉分立
structural functionalism
combination of arrest and prosecution
separation of arrest and prosecution
