摘要
本文的目的是通过文化艺术干预项目,参与到城市更新代理人与当地社区之间权力关系(power relationship)的论辩中。我们的研究提出了一个新的概念框架,重点比较解释城市社会和参与性空间理论的两个异托邦(heterotopia)概念。异托邦的概念可以追溯到米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)和亨利·列斐伏尔(Henri Lefebvre)两位重要的思想家。我们通过将其与公共空间(public space)内的艺术文化活动相联系,为当代城市建立了另一种分析范式。我们利用这两种不同的异托邦概念解读,从权力关系的角度,探索艺术实践与城市空间相互作用的含义。分析中,我们发现,福柯的异托邦概念可能有利于城市自上而下的规划和中产阶级化(gentrification),与之相反,列斐伏尔的理念可能更适合作为重新激活城市权力(the right to the city)的策略。
The purpose of this paper is to take part in the debate about power relationships in contemporary cities between the agents of urban renewal and the local communities, as mediated by cultural and artistic interventions and projects. Our study proposes a new conceptual frame, focusing on the comparison between two notions of heterotopia as theoretical alternatives for the interpretation of cities as social and participatory spaces. The notions we consider can be traced to two key thinkers Michel Foucault and Henri Lefebvre. We lay the foundation for alternative analytical paradigms of contemporary urban condition by relating them to artistic and cultural practices in the public space. We draw upon these two alternative readings of heterotopia to explore the implications of the interaction of artistic practices with urban space as a contested terrain from the viewpoint of power relationships. In our analysis, we find that Foucault’s notion of heterotopia is potentially conducive to top-down planning processes and to gentrification, while Lefebvre’s notion is possibly more suited to participatory practices as strategies of reactivation of the right to the city.
出处
《上海文化》
CSSCI
2020年第4期46-57,65,125,126,共15页
Shanghai Culture
