摘要
成书于清初的无名氏《端石考》鉴别精审、持论中肯,堪称端砚名论.该文其实是《广东新语》卷5《端石》与《端溪砚石》(后者实际上转述的是高兆《端溪砚石考》以及屈大均、陈恭尹和潘耒为之所作"跋"语)两文辑录、缀合而成,其著者是屈大均.后世引述该文时之所以隐去著者姓名或者"错"署高兆之名,是因为屈大均政治上力主反清复明,致使其诗文被清廷列入"禁毁"之列.《端石考》行世后,引起高度重视,其有关说法被频繁引述、沿用,其间虽引发不同看法甚至遭到辩驳,但是其在砚史上的地位不容忽视.
A Textual Research of Duan Stone,written anonymously in the early Qing Dynasty,which identified carefully the different types’Duan stones and put forward a well-grounded argument,can be called a famous treatise on Duanxi Inkstone.In fact,this article was compiled and joined together from Duan Stone,Duanxi Inkstone included in Guangdong Xinyu volume 5,the author of which is Qu Dajun.In the later years,scholars did not mention the author’s name or mistook author’s name for Gao Zhao,because Qu Dajun politically advocated against Qing Dynasty and for Ming Dynasty and his works were banned and destroyed.The advent of A Textual Research of Duan Stone was highly valued,its statements were quoted frequently and continued to be used.Although some of its viewpoints were in question and refuted,its important position in Duanxi Inkstone’s history cannot be ignored.
作者
钟玉发
ZHONG Yufa(College of Tourism and Historical Culture,Zhaoqing University,Zhaoqing,Guangdong 526061,China)
出处
《肇庆学院学报》
2020年第3期12-16,共5页
Journal of Zhaoqing University
关键词
《端石考》
《广东新语》
屈大均
高兆
ATextual Research of Duan Stone
Guangdong Xinyu
Qu Dajun
Gao Zhao
