期刊文献+

全髋置换术和半髋置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的对比 被引量:4

Comparison of Total Hip Replacement and Half Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比股骨颈骨折老年患者采取全髋置换术与半髋置换术治疗的临床效果。方法该次方便选择2016年1月-2018年12月该院收治股骨颈骨折老年患者68例作为研究目标,参照入院时间先后顺序分为观察组与对照组,对照组患者接受全髋置换术治疗,观察组患者接受半髋置换术治疗,记录并对比两组患者临床相关指标,评估并分析各组患者治疗前后疼痛程度及髋关节功能差异,计算两组患者术后并发症发生概率。结果观察组患者手术用时(85.89±11.02)min、术中出血量(310.55±20.14)mL、术后出血量(88.23±6.22)mL均明显少于对照组(t=7.980、20.890、7.330,P<0.05),而住院总时长(14.89±2.11)d、髋关节功能恢复时长(19.17±3.55)d则与对照组差异无统计学意义(t=0.280、0.120,P>0.05)。两组患者治疗前后疼痛评分、髋关节功能评分均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。另外,术后两组患者出现并发症的概率较相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论老年股骨颈骨折患者采取全髋置换术与半髋置换术均可达到较好的治疗效果,其中半髋置换术操作简单,对患者的伤害更小,可用作首选治疗方法。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of total hip replacement and hemihip replacement in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. Methods The choice in January 2016 to December 2018, the hospital 68 cases of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures as were conveniently selected the research target, with reference to admission time sequence is divided into observation group and control group, control group patients undergoing total hip replacement therapy, observation group of patients treated for a half a hip replacement records and compared two groups of patients with clinically relevant indicators, evaluation and analysis of each group before and after treatment in patients with pain degree and the hip function difference, calculation of two groups of patients with postoperative complications. Results The duration of operation(85.89±11.02) min, intraoperative blood loss(310.55±20.14)mL and postoperative blood loss(88.23±6.22)mL in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(t=7.980, 20.890, 7.330, P<0.05), while the total length of stay(14.89 ±2.11) d and the recovery time of hip function(19.17 ±3.55)d were not statistically significant different from those in the control group(t=0.280, 0.120, P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores and hip function scores between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the two groups, the difference was no statistical significance(P >0.05).Conclusion In elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, both total hip replacement and hemihip replacement can achieve better therapeutic effects, among which hemihip replacement is simple to operate and less harmful to patients, which can be used as the preferred treatment.
作者 徐伟 XU Wei(Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Xinyi City,Xinyi,Jiangsu Province,221400 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2020年第10期51-53,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 全髋置换术 半髋置换术 老年 股骨颈骨折 Total hip replacement Hemiarthroplasty Elderly Femoral neck fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献78

  • 1Kannan A, Kancherla R, McMahon S, et al. Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(1): 1-8.
  • 2Murphy DK, Randell T, Brennan KL, et al. Treatment and displacement affect the reoperation rate for femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(8): 2691-2702.
  • 3Cheng T, Feng IG, Liu T, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(6): 1473- 1481.
  • 4Schneider K, Audig6 L, Kuehnel SP, et al. The direct anterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(9): 1773-1781.
  • 5Murphy SB. Technique of tissue-preserving, minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty using a superior capsulotomy. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 2004, 14(2): 94-101.
  • 6Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Am Geriatr Soc, 1991, 39(2): 142-148.
  • 7Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold IP. Prospective randomizedstudy of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty, 2013, 28(9): 1634-1638.
  • 8Rottinger H. Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: early clinical results. Hip Int, 2006, 16 Suppl 4: 42-47.
  • 9Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(5): 698-704.
  • 10Chow J, Penenberg B, Murphy S. Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports. Curr Rev Musculoskelet ivied, 2011, 4(3): 146-150.

共引文献130

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部