期刊文献+

应用六西格玛管理方法评估糖化血红蛋白检测系统性能 被引量:2

Evaluation of Glycated Hemoglobin Detection System by Six Sigma Management Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:计算糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)不同检测水平西格玛(σ)值,探讨不同检测水平性能的差异。方法:根据Westgard报道的方法计算西格玛(σ)值,以2019年HbA1c两个不同水平室内质控(IQC)数据累计值为不精密度CV1和CV2,以卫健委HbA1c正确度验证计划数据计算IQC对应水平偏倚Bias1和Bias2,以卫健委室间质量评价标准为总误差(TEa),计算两个检测水平的HbA1c的σ值和质量目标指数(QGI)。结果:HbA1c检测水平1和检测水平2的σ值分别为2.00、3.21,水平1和水平2的QGI分别为1.06、0.35。结论:六西格玛管理方法可以准确评估和改进HbA1c检测系统的性能。 Objective:To calculate the sigma(σ)values in different levels of glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c)and explore the differences in performance at different detection levels.Methods:Theσvalue was calculated according to the method that reported by Westgard.The accumulative values of indoor quality control(IQC)data at two different levels of HbA1c in 2019 were imprecision CV1 and CV2.The corresponding horizontal offsets Bias1 and Bias2 of IQC were calculated from the HbA1c accuracy verification plan data of the National Health Commission.The total error(TEa)was based on the quality evaluation standard of the National Health Commission.Then theσvalue and the quality target index(QGI)of two HbA1c detection levels were calculated.Results:Theσvalues of HbA1c detection level 1 and detection level 2 were 2.00 and 3.21,and the QGI were 1.06 and 0.35,respectively.Conclusion:The six sigma management method can accurately evaluate and improve the performance of HbA1c detection system.
作者 罗宇成 陈春燕 马芹 鲜胜 Luo Yucheng;Chen Chunyan;Ma Qin;Xian Sheng(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Yichang Central People's Hospital,The First College of Clinical Medical Science,China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443003,China)
出处 《巴楚医学》 2020年第2期67-69,共3页 Bachu Medical Journal
关键词 糖化血红蛋白 六西格玛管理方法 检测系统性能评价 glycated hemoglobin six sigma management method performance evaluation of detection system
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47
  • 2Klee GG. Establishment of outcome-related analytic performance goals [Jl. ClinChem, 2010, 56(5) :714-722.
  • 3Dhatt GS, Agarwal MM, Bishawi B, et al. Implementing the Stock- holm Conference hierachy of objective quality criteria in a routine la- boratory[ J]. Chin Chem Lab Med, 2007, 45(4) :549-552.
  • 4RiliRAK. Unofficial English Translation [ EB/OL ]. (2009-10-01) [2015-05-01 ]. http//www, westgard, con~/rilibak, htm.
  • 5CLSI EP5-A. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative meas- urement methods[ S]. CLSI, 2014.
  • 6CLSI EP9-A. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[Sl. CLSI, 2002.
  • 7Harry M, Schroder R. Six Sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world's top corporations[ M ]. New York: Doubleday, 2000:232-234.
  • 8Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory per-formance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000,124(4) :516-519.
  • 9IS015189. Medical laboratories-requirements for quality and compe- tence [ S ]. International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
  • 10US Government Printing Office. Health care financing administration, department of health and human services[ Z]. 1998.

共引文献62

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部