摘要
国家监察体制改革是涉及党和国家监督体制建设的制度性创设,特别是职务犯罪侦查权的“划拨”与相关检察人员的“转隶”,对检察机关“国家法律监督机关”宪制定位产生重大而又深远的影响。从制度设计和理论阐述角度分析,监察权与检察监督权是两种完全不同类型的公权力,监察体制改革弥合了检察机关承担反贪腐职权模式的逻辑错位,并预留了检察监督制度创新空间。“新时代”的检察机关,无论是“在办案中监督、监督中办案”,还是“诉讼与监督双轨并行”,都是在保留“国家法律监督机关”宪法定位基础上,重新定位或拓展“主业主责”的尝试。目前,检察机关在发挥检察建议权职能、开展公益民行诉讼、监督政府依法行政以及司法监督等方面取得不少成绩,逐渐回归法律监督机关的职能定位。
The reform of the state supervision system is an institutional creation involving the construction of the party and state supervision system,especially the transfer of the right to investigate crimes of duty,which has a significant and far-reaching impact on the constitutional orientation of the“national legal supervision organs”of the procuratorial organs.From the perspective of institutional design and theoretical exposition,the power of supervision and the power of procuratorial supervision are two completely different types of public power.The reform of the supervision system bridges the logical misplacement of the procuratorial organs to assume the anti-corruption power model,and reserves the space for procuratorial supervision.The procuratorial organs of the“new era”,whether it is“supervising and supervising the handling of cases in handling cases”or“parallel with litigation and supervision”,are repositioning or expanding on the basis of retaining the constitutional position of“national legal supervision organs”.The main owner is responsible for the attempt.At present,the procuratorial organs have made many achievements in the functions of procuratorial and advisory powers,conducting public welfare civil lawsuits,supervising the government s administration according to law,and judicial supervision,and gradually returning to the functional orientation of the legal supervision organs.
作者
段瑞群
Duan Rui-qun(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处
《时代法学》
2020年第3期81-90,共10页
Presentday Law Science
基金
中国博士后科学基金第64批面上资助支持(资助编号2018M641968)。
关键词
法律监督机关
监察体制改革
司法体制改革
检察权
legal supervision organs
supervision system reform
judicial system reform
procuratorial power
