期刊文献+

COVID-19研究成果在中国知网网络首发状况的调查与思考 被引量:14

Investigation and thinking on the online priority publication of COVID-19 research results on CNKI
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】调查我国学术期刊在重大突发事件中的反应速度、应变能力、数字化出版、研究内容和传播效果等。【方法】以中国知网(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,CNKI)网络首发的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关论文为对象,通过Phyth 3.6软件编写数据挖掘程序来获取发表论文及其期刊信息,应用Excel软件对数据进行统计分析。【结果】2020年1月21日至2020年2月26日,共有146种中国学术期刊在CNKI平台以开放获取(Open Access,OA)形式出版COVID-19研究论文565篇,内容涉及疫情预测、疫情防控、临床诊治、病毒病理等;CNKI平台在整合传播过程中,影响力较大,效果显著,截至2020年2月27日,已有公开显示网络下载数据的460篇论文的总下载量为719485次,篇均下载量为1571次,下载超过5000次的论文有18篇,超过1000次的论文有228篇,占49.6%。【结论】我国学术期刊在疫情防控期间主要存在整体上反应不够迅速、数字化出版能力不强、网络首发平台应用不充分、行动力区域性不平衡等问题,应加快推进期刊出版的数字化、集约化和整合传播。 [Purposes]This study aims to investigate the practice of Chinese academic journals in response to major emergencies,such as the reaction speed,adaptability,digital publishing,research content,and dissemination effects. [Methods] The papers published on CNKI platform themed around COVID-19 research were collected as survey objects. A data mining program written through Phyth 3.6 was used to obtain the publishing papers and their journal information,and Excel software was used for statistical analysis of the data.[Findings]During the period from January 21,2020 to February 26,2020,a total of 146 Chinese academic journals have published 565 COVID-19 research articles in the form of open access on CNKI platform,thematically covering epidemic prediction,epidemic prevention and control,clinical diagnosis and treatment,and viral pathology. The CNKI platform has a great influence and significant effect in the process of integration and dissemination. As of February 27,2020,460 papers with publicly downloaded data have been downloaded 719485 times,each of which has been downloaded 1571 times on average and 18 of which have been downloaded more than5000 times. There are 228 papers downloaded more than 1000 times,accounting for 49.6%. [Conclusions]The academic journals in China have many problems in the epidemic prevention and control,e.g.,the response speed to major public emergencies appears not fast enough,the digital publishing capacity remains not strong enough,and the application of online priority publication platform is inadequate,which lead to such issues as regional imbalances in driving forces. It is suggested that there are more efforts in demand for Chinese academic journals to accelerate the speeds of digitization,intensification,and integration of journal publishing.
作者 王景周 崔建英 谭春林 孙升云 WANG Jingzhou;CUI Jianying;TAN Chunlin;SUN Shengyun(Editorial Office of Journal of Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China; Editorial Office of Studies in Logic,Institute of Logic and Cognition,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China; Editorial Office of Journal of South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期483-489,共7页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金 广东省哲学社会科学规划2018年度共建项目(GD18XXW05) 广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划2019年度课题(2019GZYB19)。
关键词 网络首发出版 数字出版 开放获取 学术期刊 COVID-19 Online priority publication Digital publishing Open access Academic journal COVID-19
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献82

  • 1陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. 被引量:7338
  • 2Bocquet A. Alternatives for STM Publishing in the intemet age - Apersonal view. Presentation at Science writing seminar. National Natural Science Foundation. Beijing. July 17. 2004.
  • 3Riedesel H. Current trends in international STM publishing.Presentation at the First Forum on Scientific Publishing. China Association For Science & Technology. Beijing. Sept. 8. 2004.
  • 4Testa J. Journal selection process in a changing publishin genvironment. Talk presented at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Beijing. Sept. 20. 2004.
  • 5Daniel Greenstein. Not so quiet on a Western front. University of California. 28 May 2004. http://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23. html [ 2004-09 -02 ].
  • 6Morris S. Open access and not-for-profit publishers. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. 19 March 2004.http ://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate [ 2004-09 -02 ].
  • 7McCabe M J. Snyder C M. The best business model for scholarly journals: an economist's perspective. 16 July 2004. http://www.nature. com/nature/focusdaccessdebate/28. html [2004-09-02].
  • 8Budapest Open Access Initiative. http ://www. org/openaccess/index. shtml [2004-07-21].
  • 9Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. http://www. zim. mpg. de/openaccess-beflin/berlindeclaration. html[ 2004-07-21 ].
  • 10Hunter K. Open Access: yes. no. maybe. Elsevier 19 March 2004.http ://www. nature. com./nature/focus/accessdebate/ [2004-08-12].

共引文献322

同被引文献109

引证文献14

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部