摘要
关于知识产权的正当性这一知识产权领域的基本理论问题,学者们通常寻求不同的理论支撑作为论证的依据。以在解释知识产权正当性时广受推崇的洛克劳动财产理论来看,虽然该理论对解释知识产权的正当性做出了肯定性的历史贡献,但其在解释过程中所存在的诸多局限性和不足,也说明了纯粹用一种理论来单独证成知识产权的正当性是不可取的。因此,在解释知识产权的正当性问题上,我们应该探寻的是一种多元理论价值的集成。
Regarding the legitimacy of intellectual property,a basic theoretical issue in the field of intellectual property,scholars often seek different theoretical support as the basis for their argument.Based on Locke's theory of labor and property,which is widely respected in explaining the legitimacy of intellectual property,although the theory has made a positive historical contribution to the legitimacy of explaining intellectual property,there are many limitations in theinterpretation process,which also shows that it is not advisable to use a single theory to justify the justification of intellectual property rights alone.Therefore,in explaining the legitimacy of intellectual property,we should explore a combination of multiple theoretical values.
作者
张婷
陈文欣
ZHANG Ting;CHEN Wenxin(Chongqing Intellectual Property School,Chongqing University of Technology,Chongqing 400054)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2020年第7期100-105,共6页
China Invention & Patent
关键词
洛克
劳动财产理论
知识产权
正当性
Locke
labor property theory
intellectual property
legitimacy
