期刊文献+

脊髓损伤肠道功能障碍干预方案的临床应用研究 被引量:9

Study on the clinical application of the intervention program of bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·验证前期构建的脊髓损伤(spinal cord injury,SCI)肠道功能障碍干预方案的有效性。方法·选择2018年1—12月入院上海市某康复中心的80例脊髓损伤肠道功能障碍患者,按入院时间分为干预组和对照组,每组40例。对照组采用常规护理进行干预,干预组采用该研究构建的干预方案进行干预。比较2组患者入院时、干预后4周、出院后1个月的肠道功能指标和入院时、出院前1 d的生存质量。结果·干预后,干预组患者的排便频率、粪便性状评分、排便时间、腹胀、便秘发生率和药物依赖率均低于对照组(均P<0.05),其生存质量总分和各领域得分均高于对照组(均P<0.05)。除社会领域外,2组患者干预后和入院时生存质量差值比较在总分和其他领域间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论·脊髓损伤肠道功能障碍干预方案能有效恢复SCI患者肠道功能,降低肠道并发症的发生率,改善患者生存质量。 Objective·To verify the effectiveness of the intervention program of bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury(SCI).Methods·Eighty bowel dysfunction patients with SCI in a rehabilitation hospital in Shanghai from Jan.to Dec.2018 were included.According to the time of admission,the patients were divided into intervention group and control group,with 40 cases in each group.The patients in the control group received the routine nursing,and the patients in the intervention group were provided with the intervention program constructed by this study.The bowel function indexes of the two groups were compared at the time of admission,4 weeks after intervention and 1 month after discharge.The quality of life in the two groups was compared at the time of admission and 1 day before discharge.Results·After intervention,the defecation frequency,fecal character score,defecation time,abdominal distention,constipation rate and drug dependence rate of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group(all P<0.05),and their total scores of quality of life and the scores in various fields were higher than those of the control group(all P<0.05).The differences in the quality of life between the two groups of patients after intervention and at the time of admission were statistically significant except for the social field(all P<0.05).Conclusion·The intervention program for bowel dysfunction patients with SCI can effectively lead to the recovery of the bowel function,reduce the incidence of bowel complications,and improve the quality of their life.
作者 韦小梅 胡三莲 钱会娟 魏薇萍 王飞燕 WEI Xiao-mei;HU San-lian;QIAN Hui-juan;WEI Wei-ping;WANG Fei-yan(Department of Emergency,Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200233,China;Department of Nursing,Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200233,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期828-834,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 2018年度上海市卫生和计划生育委员会课题(201840105) 上海市教育委员会护理高原学科建设项目——多学科创新基金项目(Hlgy1808dxk) 上海市教育委员会护理高原学科建设项目——国际交流基金项目(Hlgy1860qnhb) 上海市教育委员会护理高原学科建设项目——科研型临床护士基金(Hlgy1820kyx)。
关键词 脊髓损伤 肠道功能障碍 干预方案 效果 spinal cord injury(SCI) bowel dysfunction intervention program effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1熊芝兰.类风湿性关节炎患者采用自我评定版Barthel指数的效度[J].国外医学(物理医学与康复学分册),1996,16(1):17-18. 被引量:4
  • 2王方永,李建军,洪毅,关骅.采用ASIA 2000标准对脊髓损伤患者步行能力的预后评估[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):276-279. 被引量:6
  • 3王方永,李建军,洪毅.用ASIA2000标准评估脊髓损伤神经功能恢复的初步研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(7):568-570. 被引量:13
  • 4汪家琮主编.日常生活与环境改造[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.25-26.
  • 5吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].7版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1329-1330.
  • 6Korner -Bitensky N, Wood -Dauphine S. Barthel Index infonnation elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable [J]? American Journal of Physical Medicine,1995, 74: 9--18.
  • 7Mahoney FI. Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index[J]. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965,14:56--61.
  • 8Collin C. Wade DT. Davies S,et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study [J]. International Disability Studies, 1988,10(2): 61 --63.
  • 9Murdock C. A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index . Part 1 [J]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992,55 (3), 109--111.
  • 10Murdock C. A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index. Part 2 [J]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992,55 (3), 153--156.

共引文献2345

同被引文献120

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部