摘要
大数据时代,个人信息“被遗忘权”是否应该被确立为法律权利以及如何确立为法律权利,在理论上和实践上都存有争议。欧盟通过《个人数据保护指令》《一般数据保护条例》以及“冈萨雷斯诉谷歌案”,在立法上和司法上正式确立了个人信息“被遗忘权”。基于法律文化传统以及利益博弈等原因,美国个人信息“被遗忘权”局部实践的力度逊于欧盟,并未在法律体系上将其明确为法律权利。我国应当正视欧美立法差异及其经验教训,充分认识个人信息“被遗忘权”本土化的可能性,在《民法典》“人格权编”和未来个人信息专门立法中对个人信息“被遗忘权”作出明确规定。
In the era of big data,there are disputes in theory and practice about whether and how the right to be forgotten about personal information should be stipulated as a legal one.On the basis of the Personal Data Protection Directive,General Data Protection Regulation and the case of“GoogleSpain SL,Google Inc.v AEPD and Mario Costeja González”,the EU has formally stipulated the right to be forgotten about personal information both in legislation and judicature.Because of the tradition of legal culture and the game of interests,the enforcement of the right to be forgotten in USA is weaker than that in the EU,which it is not even defined as a legal right in the legal system.We should fully recognize the legislative difference between EU and US,the possibility of the localization of the right to be forgotten about personal information,and clearly stipulate it in the Personality Rights of the Civil Code and the future special legislation of personal information.
作者
刘利平
何玉婷
LIU Li-ping;He Yu-ting(School of Public Administration,Yancheng Teachers University,Yancheng,Jiangsu 224007,China;Shanghai Fangben(Yancheng)Law Firm,Yancheng,Jiangsu 224000,China)
出处
《盐城师范学院学报（人文社会科学版）》
2020年第2期95-103,共9页
Journal of Yancheng Teachers University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目“大数据时代被遗忘权的制度建构与法律适用研究”(2017SJB1531)
江苏省社科应用研究精品工程课题“新时代江苏防范‘塔西佗陷阱’的路径对策研究”(18SYA-044)。
关键词
个人信息
被遗忘权
数据保护
一般人格权
personal information
the right to be forgotten
data protection
general personality rights
