期刊文献+

赔付模式对财政补贴型农业保险风险保障的影响研究 被引量:12

The Impact of Indemnity Scheme on the Risk Protection of Government-subsidized Agricultural Insurance
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国农业保险进入高质量发展阶段,提高保险保障水平是新阶段发展的重要目标之一。本文通过深入分析中美农业产量保险中的典型赔付模式,提出了通过优化农业产量保险赔付模式来提高农业保险保障效果的设想。研究发现:中美主流农业产量保险采取了两种截然不同的赔付模式,中国采取的是比例式赔付,美国采取的是差额式赔付;两种赔付模式差异很大,当保费补贴高于附加费用时,在相同的保费补贴下,差额式赔付比比例式赔付有更高的保额和更高的均值-方差效用。将我国农业保险赔付模式从比例式转为差额式,可以在不改变补贴资金规模的情况下显著地提升农业保险风险保障效果。研究结论为如何在财政约束下提高农业保险保障水平提供了新的可选路径。 Chinese agricultural insurance has stepped into a high-quality development stage.One of the targets for this stage is to increase its level of risk protection.By comparing the indemnity schemes of Chinese and American crop insurance plans,this paper proposed that the risk protection level could be improved by refining the compensation model.We found that,China and the U.S.adopted two different indemnity schemes for agricultural insurance programs.Specifically,China adopted the proportional indemnification scheme while the U.S.adopted the deficiency indemnification scheme.These two schemes are significantly different.When the premium subsidy is higher than the expenses loading,the deficiency indemnification scheme has a larger amount of coverage and a higher mean-variance utility under the same amount of subsidy.Switching the indemnity scheme of Chinese agricultural insurance from the proportional model to the deficiency model can greatly improve the risk protection effect without increasing government subsidy.This finding provides a new insight for improving the protection level of agricultural insurance under fiscal constraints.
作者 肖宇谷 王克 何小伟 H.Holly Wang XIAO Yu-gu;WANG Ke;HE Xiao-wei;H.Holly WANG
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第7期63-76,共14页 Insurance Studies
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA052) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD910001) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71573041,71603262) 中国人民大学2020年度“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”的支持和资助。
关键词 农业保险 风险保障 赔付模式 均值-方差效用 agricultural insurance risk protection indemnity scheme mean-variance utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1宁满秀,邢郦,钟甫宁.影响农户购买农业保险决策因素的实证分析——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J].农业经济问题,2005,26(6):38-44. 被引量:149
  • 2宁满秀,苗齐,邢鹂,钟甫宁.农户对农业保险支付意愿的实证分析——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J].中国农村经济,2006(6):43-51. 被引量:102
  • 3张卓,刘杰.对我国农业保险产品创新的思考[J].决策参考,2007,(2):234.
  • 4Babcock, A. , Hart, E. and Hayes, J. , "Crop insurance rates and the laws of probability" [ R ]. Working pa- per, April, 2002.
  • 5Babcock,A. and Hart, E. ," Influence of the Premium Subsidy on Farmers' Crop Insurance Coverage Deci- sions" [ R ]. Working Paper, April, 2005.
  • 6Barnett, J. , Black, J. and Skees, R. , "Is area yield insurance competitive with farm yield insurance" [ J ].Journal of agricultural and resource economics, August ,2005,30 (2), pp. 285 -301.
  • 7Chite, R. W. , "Federal Crop Insurance : background and current issue " [ R ]. Congressional research service report, December, 1988, pp. 88 - 739.
  • 8Goodwin, B. ," Problems with Market Insurance in Agriculture" [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Eco- nomics, August,2001,83 (3) : pp. 643 - 649.
  • 9Joseph, W. ," Crop Insurance Reconsidered" [ R ]. American Journal Agriculture Economics, 2004,86 ( 5 ) : pp. 1179 - 1195.
  • 10Just, R. , Calvin, L. and Quiggin, J. , "Adverse Selection in Crop Insurance : Actuarial and Asymmetric lnt0r- mation Incentives" [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999,81, pp. 834 - 849.

共引文献290

同被引文献171

引证文献12

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部