摘要
污染环境罪主客观要件的司法认定和立法完善问题是惩治和预防环境犯罪的重要问题。从实然角度看,污染环境罪的主观方面应属复合罪过,其客观方面则应视不同语境进行择取:如果仅立足于我国《刑法》本身的规定,其为结果犯;如果基于“两高”司法解释的规定,则可以得出其既可能是行为犯,也可能是结果犯的结论。从立法应然的角度出发,对污染环境罪规定严格责任和危险犯具有合理性,但应把握必要的限度。
The problems about the subjective and objective requisites of environmental pollution crime in the judicial determination and legislative perfection is an important problem of punishing and preventing environmental crime. From the perspectives of solid however, the subjective aspect of environmental pollution crime is compound guilty. Its objective aspect should be selected according to different contexts. If we stand on the provisions of criminal code, it should still be consequential offense;If we base on the provisions of the judicial interpretation given by the supreme people’s court and supreme people’s procuratorate, it may be behavioral offense or consequential offense. In terms of should however, it is reasonable that strict liability and potential damage offense are regulated in environmental pollution crime, but we should grasp the necessary limit.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第9期76-84,共9页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“环境犯罪刑事政策研究”(项目编号:14BFX183)的研究成果。
关键词
污染环境罪
复合罪过
严格责任
危险犯
environmental pollution crime
compound guilty
strict liability
potential dam-age offense
