摘要
目的:比较经椎间孔选择性神经根阻滞术治疗或保守疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:2016年6月-2019年10月收治神经根型颈椎病患者87例,随机分为两组。A组采用经椎间孔选择性神经根阻滞术治疗;B组采用保守疗法治疗。比较两组视觉模拟评分(VAS)和颈椎功能障碍指数评分(NDI)。结果:A组治疗后NDI评分、上肢及颈肩VAS评分均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经椎间孔选择性神经根阻滞术的临床疗效较牵引保守治疗好,能更好地缓解疼痛、消除炎症。
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of transforaminal selective nerve root block or conservative therapy in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Methods:From June 2016 to October 2019,87 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were selectged,they were randomly divided into the two groups.The group A was treated with transforaminal selective nerve root block.The group B was treated with conservative therapy.The visual analogue score(VAS)and the cervical dysfunction index score(NDI)were compared between the two groups.Results:After treatment,the NDI score and the VAS score of upper limb and neck and shoulder in the group A were lower than those in the group B,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of transforaminal selective nerve root block surgery is better than conservative traction treatment,which can better relieve pain and eliminate inflammation.
作者
张宝亮
毕洁瑞
申志光
朱红
高蕾
董金霞
王跃
Zhang Baoliang;Bi Jierui;Shen Zhiguang;Zhu Hong;Gao Lei;Dong Jinxia;Wang Yue(The People's Hospital of Yanshan County,Hebei Province,Hebei Cangzhou 061300)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2020年第26期80-81,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
神经根型颈椎病
经椎间孔选择性神经根阻滞术
牵引疗法
Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
Transforaminal selective nerve root block
Traction therapy
