摘要
汉唐之间,史部在中国古代图书分类中的地位及其变化最为显著。《汉书·艺文志》中,史学附属于经部之下,没有独立的史部类属。因受时代激发,魏晋南北朝时期史学获得多途发展,经学与史学开始学术分离,并逐渐摆脱从属于经的附属地位。与此同时,文史之间开始出现裂隙,异路而行,史学与文学的学术界线变得清晰起来。在此期目录学家的图书分类上,由"子"在"史"先演变为"史"居"子"前,实现了史学地位的跃升,经、史、子、集四部的序列位置就此确定下来。子部与史部的换位,从表面上来看,是中国古代图书分类方法的调整和改变,实质上是魏晋南北朝时期学术发展及学术分野在图书文献分类上的反映。
The status and its change of historical works in the classification of ancient Chinese books were most significant between Han and Tang Dynasties.In the book Hanshu:Yi-wen-zhi(the Chronological History of the Former Han Dynasty:Annals of Directory Contents),there was no independent item of historiography which was only an under item of the philosophical classics.With the development of historiography,it dissociated from the philosophical classics and became an independent subject during Wei,Jin and Northern-Southern Dynasties.This not only helped historiography to change its subsidiary status of the philosophical classics,but also made it demarcate with literature,and got it upgraded by topping the Confucian classics to finally determine its sequence position of the four types of classics namely philosophical classics,historiography,Confucian classics and Poetry.On the surface,the change of the sequence position of historiography in the four types was a change of ways about book classification in ancient China,but essentially it was the reflection of the academic development and academic division in the book classification during Wei,Jin and Southern-Northern Dynasties.
作者
李传印
LI Chuan-yin(School of Humanities,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2020年第4期86-93,共8页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“魏晋南北朝时期的家传研究”(18YJA770003)。
关键词
四部分类
学术史
经史关系
魏晋南北朝
classification of four types of classics
academic history
the relation of Confucian classics studies and history studies
Wei,Jin and Southern-Northern Dynasties
