摘要
人工智能因其强大的技术优势进入法院。当人工智能被赋予司法审判主体资格后,智慧法官代替法官审判,存在现实层面的需求和技术层面的可能性,并能够帮助法院提高效率和降低成本。但需要注意的是,不同于原有的法律辅助系统,智慧法官参与审判活动,将会产生巨大的伦理冲击,尤其是对被审判人而言,事关人类的尊严。因此,需要对智慧法官的审判加以限制,即智慧法官仅能处理以裁定为主的程序性事项以及以调解为主的相对程序性事项中除涉及人身关系以外的部分,不能处理实体性事项,即智慧法官不能对人进行判决。
In the era of artificial intelligence,the court starts to use artificial intelligence due to its immense technical advantages.When artificial intelligence is qualified as judicial subjectivity,the smart judge shall replace the human judges in trial,which can meet practical needs and technical possibilities.It can also boost the court efficiency and reduce costs.However,it should be noted that the participation of smart judges in trials,rather than the original trial system,will cause a huge ethical conflict,especially for the accused,concerning human dignity.Therefore,it is necessary to have restrains of the trials by smart judges,that is,smart judges can only deal with procedural matters(mainly ruling procedures)and relative procedural matters(mainly mediation)except those involving human relationship.Smart judges cannot deal with substantive matters,in other words,they cannot trial on humans.
作者
黄辰
潘留杰
HUANG Chen;PAN Liujie(Criminal Justice School,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450003,China;School of Civil Commercial and Economic Law,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450003,China)
出处
《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第4期63-70,共8页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“刑事案件事实认定的推论基础与解释性结构研究”(19CFX036)。
关键词
智慧法官
伦理冲突
司法审判
基本立场
smart judge
ethical conflict
judicial trial
basic position
