期刊文献+

不同微物理参数化方案对降雨数值模拟的影响试验--以北京为例 被引量:2

Numerical Test of Different Micro-Physic Schemes to Heavy Rain Forecast: Take Beijing as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市暴雨预报对防洪排涝具有重要意义。基于中尺度数值天气预报模型WRF,构建北京市暴雨模拟模型,采用13种微物理参数化方案,对2007年8月1日下午至8月2日凌晨的暴雨过程进行了模拟试验。结果表明,对该场降雨,Kessler方案模拟得到的面平均降雨量与实测值最接近;WSM5方案模拟得到的面平均降雨过程与实测过程吻合最好;累积降雨高值区域落区模拟和最大1h降雨强度模拟,Milbrandt方案表现最好;综合考虑降雨量、降雨过程、累积降雨高值区域落区范围和最大1h降雨强度指标,Milbrandt和Thompson方案表现最好。此外,相比单矩方案,采用多矩方案可能会提高对微物理过程的描述精度。研究结果对北京市暴雨预报具有一定参考意义。 Heavy rain forecast is very important to urban flood control and drainage system.Based on WRF,the numerical rainfall model of Beijing metropolitan area was established and 13 kinds of micro-physic schemes were tested to simulate the heavy rain in the evening of August 1st,2007.The results show that,the Kessler scheme performs the best in the simulation of rainfall volume,the WSM5 scheme performs the best in the distribution of rainfall process,and the Milbrandt scheme performs the best in the heavy rain landing area and the maximum hourly rainfall intensity.Taking all the factors into consideration,the Milbrandt scheme and Thompson scheme behave the best.The study could provide a reference for the heavy rain forecast in Beijing.
作者 侯爱中 胡智丹 朱冰 付静 周国良 HOU Aizhong;HU Zhidan;ZHU Bing;FU Jing;ZHOU Guoliang(Information Center(Hydrology Monitor and Forecast Center),Ministry of Water Resources,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《水文》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期41-48,共8页 Journal of China Hydrology
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目“城市洪涝灾害预警与全景式决策云平台”(91846203) 国家重点研发计划项目“中小河流洪水防控与应急管理关键技术研究与示范”(2018YFC1508100,2018YFC1508103)。
关键词 数值降雨预报 WRF 微物理参数化方案 北京 numerical rainfall forecast WRF micro-physic scheme Beijing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献113

  • 1肖辉,王孝波,周非非,洪延超,黄美元.强降水云物理过程的三维数值模拟研究[J].大气科学,2004,28(3):385-404. 被引量:64
  • 2章国材.美国WRF模式的进展和应用前景[J].气象,2004,30(12):27-31. 被引量:178
  • 3赵思雄,曾庆存.东亚强寒潮——冷涌越过赤道并引发南半球热带气旋和强降水的个例研究[J].气候与环境研究,2005,10(3):507-525. 被引量:22
  • 4宋巧云,魏凤英,许晨海.淮河流域暴雨过程的数值模拟和诊断分析[J].南京气象学院学报,2006,29(3):342-347. 被引量:27
  • 5Chen F, Dudhia J. 2001. Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity [J]. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 (1): 569-585.
  • 6Dudhia J. 1989. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoseale two-dimensional model [J]. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 (20): 3077-3107.
  • 7Hong S Y, Dudhia J, Chen S H. 2004. A revised approaeh to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation [J]. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 (1): 103-120.
  • 8Hong S Y, Juang H M H, Zhao Q Y. 1998. Implementation of prognostic cloud scheme for a regional spectral Model [J]. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126(10):2621-2639.
  • 9Hong S Y, Noh Y, Dudhia J. 2006. A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes [J]. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 (9): 2318-2341.
  • 10lsidora J, Gallus W A J, Segal M, et al. 2005. The impact of different WRF model physical parameterizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall [J]. Wea. Forecasting, 20 (6): 1048-1060.

共引文献63

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部