期刊文献+

前瞻性研究中效应指标危险比(RR)和风险比(HR)的辨析与转换 被引量:6

Discrimination and conversion between hazard ratio and risk ratio as effect measures in prospective studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 危险比(risk ratio,RR)和风险比(hazard ratio,HR)是前瞻性研究中常用的效应指标。但在原始研究和Meta分析中描述效应量大小时不能交替使用,如何选择合适的指标并正确解读是临床研究的关键。本文总结了效应指标中危险和风险的异同点,对比RR和HR在估计方法和临床解读之间的差异,并在同一研究中比较RR和HR的区别,并提供可行的转换公式便于在Meta分析的合并中使用。 Risk ratio(RR)and hazard ratio(HR)are two common effect measures in prospective studies.When describing the magnitude of clinical effects in the original study and meta-analysis,they cannot be used interchangeably.Selecting an appropriate measures and interpreting them correctly is critical in clinical research.In this study,we summarized similarities and differences between risk and hazard,compared differences between RR and HR in estimation methods and clinical interpretation.The magnitude of RR and HR estimated from the same studies were compared,and two feasible formulas converting between RR and HR were presented for meta-analysis.
作者 黄桥 赵明娟 罗丽莎 邓通 曾宪涛 王行环 HUANG Qiao;ZHAO Mingjuan;LUO Lisha;DENG Tong;ZENG Xiantao;WANG Xinghuan(Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,P.R.China;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,P.R.China;Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology,The Second Clinical College,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,P.R.China;Department of Urology,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期1221-1225,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划“科技助力经济2020”重点专项(编号:SQ2020YFF0426494) 国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项(编号:2016YFC0106300) 湖北省第二届医学领军人才工程第一层次基金,武汉市卫建委新冠肺炎疫情防控应急科研专项重点项目(编号:EG20A02)。
关键词 前瞻性研究 危险比 风险比 转换 Prospective study Risk ratio Hazard ratio Conversion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1李祝华.流行病学中适用OR估计RR的误差分析[J].中国现代医药杂志,2006,8(12):137-137. 被引量:1
  • 2Reichenheim ME, Coutinho ES, Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2010,10:66.
  • 3Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health, 2008,53 (3) : 165-167.
  • 4Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med, 1999,341 (4) : 279-283,286-287.
  • 5Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics, 1985,41 ( 1 ) : 55-68.
  • 6Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med, 1998,55 (4) : 272-277.
  • 7Zhang J, Kai FY. What's the relative risk? JAMA, 1998,280 (19) : 1691)-1691.
  • 8Mcnutt LA,Wu C,Xue X,et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol, 2003,157 (10) : 940-943.
  • 9Santos CA, Fiaccone RL, Oliveira NF, et al. Estimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological data. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2008,8 : 80.
  • 10Localio AR, Margolis D J, Berlin JA. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007,60(9) : 874-882.

共引文献19

同被引文献50

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部