期刊文献+

试论新修订《药品质量抽查检验管理办法》中的风险管理 被引量:3

Discussion on the risk management of the newly revised “regulations for drug quality sampling and testing”
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的旨在通过对新修订《药品质量抽查检验管理办法》的分析和探讨,提出可行的应对举措和建议,推动药品抽检管理模式的创新。方法基于风险管理理念,结合药品抽查检验工作中的实际问题,对《药品质量抽查检验管理办法》中相关条款的要求进行分析和梳理,对加强国家药品抽检中的风险管理工作提出建议和对策。结果与结论《药品质量抽查检验管理办法》中包括了风险评估、风险控制和风险沟通和审核三个方面的多个条款,药品监督管理部门应该组织开展技术分析和研判,发现抽检品种可能存在的风险信号,并根据风险评估结果采取相应的风险控制和监管措施,并对有关工作情况进行信息公开。 Objective To put forward some feasible countermeasures and suggestions through the analysis and discussion of the newly revised"regulations for drug quality sampling and testing"so as to promote the innovation of the management mode of drug sampling inspection.Methods Based on the concept of risk management,combined with the problems in drug quality sampling and testing,the requirements of the relevant provisions in the newly revised regulations were analyzed,then some suggestions and countermeasures on improving drug sampling test in the new period were proposed.Results and conclusions Drug quality random inspection is one of the important means of post-market drug supervision.The drug supervision and management department should carry out technical analysis to discover the possible risk signals of random inspection varieties,and then it can take corresponding risks control measures based on the results of risk assessment.Finally,the relevant work information can be made public.
作者 朱嘉亮 郗昊 胡骏 李哲媛 杨悦 朱炯 ZHU Jialiang;XI Hao;HU Jun;LI Zheyuan;YANG Yue;ZHU Jiong(National Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 102629,China;Shanghai Institute for Food and Drug Safety;Yunnan Institute for Food and Drug Control,Kunming 650106;Institute of Drug Regulatory Sciences,Shenyang Pharmaceutical University,Shenyang 110016,China)
出处 《沈阳药科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期827-832,共6页 Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University
关键词 药品 抽查检验 风险管理 Drug quality sampling and testing Risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1陈宪平,赵武生,范敏怡.白矾与枯矾的超微结构、元素组成成分及作用机理的研究[J].南京中医药大学学报,1996,12(3):28-29. 被引量:4
  • 2FDA. This week in FDA history-Oct. 10, 1962[ EB/OL ]. (2009 - 05 - 20 ) [ 2010 - 06 - 15 ]. http ://www. fda. gov/AboutFDA/ WhatWeDo/History/ThisWeek/ucm117867. htm.
  • 3FDA. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) [EB/OL].( 2009 - 07 - 17 ) [2010 - 6 - 15]. http ://www. fda. gov/About- FDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm106491. htm.
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Monitoring. The importance of pharmacovigilance. 2002.
  • 5O'neill RT. Biostatistical considerations in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology: linking quantitative risk assessment in premarket licensure application safety data, post-market alert reports and formal epidemiological studies, StatistMed, 1998,17: 1851-1858.
  • 6Waller PC,Lee EH. Responding to drug safety issues. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 1999, 8: 535-552.
  • 7Bennett CL, Nebeker JR, Lyons EA, et al. The research on adverse events and reports (RADAR) project, JAMA, 2005, 293: 2131-2140.
  • 8Wilson AM, Thabane L, Holbrook A. Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2003, 57(2): 127-134.
  • 9Hauben M,Zhou Xiaofeng.Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance. Drug Safety, 2003, 26(3): 159-186.
  • 10Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology(2nd edition). Lippincott: Williams&Wilkins, 1998.

共引文献87

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部