期刊文献+

模糊综合评价在高校教师职称评审多元评价中的应用——以教学型为例 被引量:1

Application of Multi-evaluation Model for Title Evaluation in Colleges:Taking the Teaching-based Evaluation Approach for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于人的全面发展理论建立人才多元评价体系是解决当前高校教师职称评审标准单一问题的必由之路,多元评价为教师专业技术职务晋升提供多元途径,有助于提升教师专业发展获得感,实现学校、教师和学生三方共赢.职称评审多元评价综合考虑高校人才培养、科研、社会服务的功能需求,设计了教学型、研究型、教学与科研并重型、教学与社会服务并重型等多类评价方式.在多元评价体系构建中,充分考虑多元评价标准的科学性、多元评价价值感的一致性和多元评价结果的公平性等问题.以教学型为例构建模糊综合评价模型,算例表明,模型区分度高、可操作性强并适用于多元评价途径. To establish the multi-evaluation system of talents,based on the theory of all-round development of human beings,is the only way to solve the problem of single evaluation standard as for title evaluation in colleges,which not only provides multiple ways for teachers’professional and technical promotion,but also helps to enhance teachers’sense of professional development,and thus,achieving a win-win situation among schools,teachers and students.The multi-evaluation system for the title evaluation takes into account the functional needs of personnel training,scientific research and social services in colleges,and then the multiple evaluation approaches of teaching,scientific research,teaching and social service,teaching and scientific research are designed.The scientific nature of multi-evaluation criteria,the consistency of multi-evaluation sense of value,and the fairness of multi-evaluation results have been fully considered in the construction of multi-evaluation system,and an evaluation approach of teaching has been taken as an example to build the evaluation model.The example shows that the model has high discrimination degree,strong operability and is suitable for multiple evaluation approaches.
作者 戴汉良 DAI Hanliang(Liming Vocational University,Quanzhou 362000,China)
机构地区 黎明职业大学
出处 《广西科技师范学院学报》 2020年第5期127-134,共8页 Journal of Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University
基金 福建省教育厅课题“基于AHP的高职院校行政管理人员绩效考核体系构建与实践”(MGJY025)。
关键词 高校教师 多元评价 模糊综合评价 教学型 colleges teachers title evaluation multi-evaluation teaching-based
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

  • 1左惠凯,李晓燕.完善高校职称评定中学术论文量化标准[J].河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,5(2):93-95. 被引量:5
  • 2顾建民.学科差异与学术评价[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(2):42-46. 被引量:50
  • 3马克思恩格斯全集·第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社.1974.284.
  • 4[美]文森特·奥斯特罗姆,等.制度分析与发展的反思:问题与抉择[M].王诚,等,译.北京:商务印书馆,1992.
  • 5[法]布尔迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术-布尔迪厄访谈录[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:192.
  • 6汪丁丁.生活,职称,逆淘汰及其他[EB/OL].学术批评网,2001-11-22.
  • 7Flora F. Tien; Robert T. Blackburn ( Jan. - Feb. , 1996). Faculty Rank System,Research Motivation, and Faculty Research Productivity:Measure Refinement and Theory Testing" [ J ]. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 67, No. 1. , pp. 2.
  • 8Ingrid Moses ( 1986 ). Promotion of Academic Staff: Reward and Incentive[ J]. Higher Education,Vol. 15 ,No. 1/2.
  • 9[美]卡罗尔·索尔坦.作为政治产品的制度[M]//马海军,编译.薛晓源,陈家刚.全球化与新制度主义.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:279.
  • 10[美]约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人,译.南京:译林出版社,2000:285.

共引文献42

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部