期刊文献+

外交文化架构与对外政策构建:美国“新丝路战略”话语分析 被引量:6

Diplomatic Culture and Foreign Policy Construction:A Frame Analysis of the U.S.’s“New Silk Road Strategy”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究从批评话语分析视角出发,对美国国务院高官发表的有关“新丝路战略”的演讲进行了架构分析。结果发现,该类话语是以美国对外政策话语和“丝绸之路”话语的深层架构为基础,在表层架构对其显性和隐性侧面进行操控性交替运用形成的。总体而言,其表层架构意在表明美国在中亚地区奉行积极的和平、安全、稳定、发展、合作、互联互通的外交政策。其中,次级架构的显性侧面突出“美国对该战略的巨大贡献”和“该战略对阿富汗的重要作用”,而隐性侧面则暗示“美国是上帝选择的世界领袖”,“其政策重点是实现和捍卫美国的国家利益”。美国政府利用这一架构一方面迎合了美国人的认知模式,另一方面也试图消除阿富汗人对美国战略目标的质疑。 Following Critical Discourse Analysis,this paper is a frame analysis of speeches made by high-ranking officials of the United States Department of State since 2011 when the“New Silk Road Strategy”was initiated.The findings show that,embedded in the deep frame of U.S.diplomatic culture and the historical Silk Road narrative,the discourse arises from the officials’manipulative use of covert and overt elements in the surface frame.The surface frame as a whole aims to exhibit a positive U.S.foreign policy oriented toward peace,security,stability,development,cooperation,and connectivity in Central Asia,with subframes indicating different perspectives.The overt side represents the U.S.as“having made great contributions to the strategy”and the strategy as“benefiting Afghanistan a lot”,while the covert side hints that“the U.S.is a God-chosen leader of the world”and“its policy priority is to achieve and defend U.S.national interests”.The frame,as an effort to explain U.S.strategic goals,is designed to fit into the cognitive model of the Americans on one hand and to relieve Afghans’suspicion of the U.S.initiative on the other hand.
作者 尤泽顺 卓丽 You Zeshun;Zhuo Li(Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,China)
机构地区 福建师范大学
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2020年第4期36-55,共20页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“近年来中国与周边国家(日、菲、印)涉领土争议双方的话语模式对比研究”(项目编号:18BYY068)的阶段性成果。
关键词 新丝路战略 美国外交文化 对外政策 架构 批评话语分析 New Silk Road Strategy U.S.diplomatic culture foreign policy frame Critical Discourse Analysis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献82

  • 1朱永生.框架理论对语境动态研究的启示[J].外语与外语教学,2005(2):1-4. 被引量:64
  • 2戴炜华,高军.批评语篇分析:理论评述和实例分析[J].外国语,2002,25(6):42-48. 被引量:185
  • 3支永碧.批评话语分析研究新动态[J].外语与外语教学,2007(3):27-32. 被引量:51
  • 4窦卫霖.政治词汇的文化内涵及其语言策略[J].外国语,2007,30(4):20-27. 被引量:18
  • 5FILLMORE C. Frame Semantics [ A]. In D. Geeraerts ( ed. ). Cognitive Linguistics : Basic Readings [ C ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1982:373 - 400.
  • 6LEE D. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press ,2001:87 - 107.
  • 7LAKOFF G. Framing the issues: UC Berkeley professor George Lakoff tells how conservatives use language to domi- nate politics [ EB/OL ]. (2003 - 10 - 27 ) [ 2009 - 10 - 07]. http://www. berkeley. edu/news/media/releasea/ 2003/10/27 - Lakoff. shtml.
  • 8FILLMORE C,ATKINS B. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its neighbors [ A ]. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay ( eds. ). Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Es- says in Semantic and Lexical Organization [ C ]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Ertbaum Associates, 1992:75-103.
  • 9UNGERER F, SCHMID H. J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.2001:89-91.
  • 10PETRUCK M. Frame Semantics [ A ]. In J. O. Ostman, J. Blommaet, C. Bulcaen ( eds. ). Handbook of Pragmatics [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadephia: Benjamins, 1996:1 - 13.

共引文献122

同被引文献142

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部