摘要
《中华人民共和国公司法》第十六条第二款、第三款的理解应采“担保决议机制说”。一人公司为股东担保之决议不符合该条的形式要求,仅意味着对担保决议程序的违反,而非对担保效力的否定,尚需进一步判定担保决议的效力。根据公司人格理论,一人公司之独立意思也应得到尊重,唯一的股东可行使相当于股东会的职权,其作出的为股东担保的决议(决定)应属有效决议,不存在效力瑕疵。当公司担保之标的系股权转让款时,该标的之特殊性亦不违反资本维持原则以及公司回购股份的规定。故应当肯定一人公司为股东担保的效力。特定情形下对公司债权人之救济,可通过法人格否认制度、债权人的撤销权与代位权等路径实现。
The second and third paragraphs of Article 16 of Company Law of the People’s Republic of China should be understood as“the guarantee resolution mechanism”.The resolution of the one-person company’s guarantee for the shareholders does not meet the formal requirements of this article,which only means a violation of the procedure of the guarantee resolution,not a denial of the validity of the guarantee,and the validity of the guarantee resolution needs to be further determined.According to the theory of corporate personality,the independence of a one-person company should also be respected.The sole shareholder exercises the functions and powers equivalent to the board of shareholders,and the resolution(decision)which guarantee for the sole shareholder is effective without any validity flaw.When the subject of the guarantee is the equity transfer money,it does not violate the principle of capital maintenance and the provisions of the company’s share repurchase.Therefore,the effectiveness of the one-person company’s guarantee for shareholders should be affirmed.The relief of the company’s creditors can be realized through the system of denial of corporate personality,the right of cancellation and subrogation of the creditors.
作者
陈扬
CHEN Yang(Law School,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)
出处
《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第4期32-40,共9页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
一人公司
担保
担保效力
债权人救济
one-person company
guarantee
guarantee effectiveness
the creditor’s relief
