期刊文献+

教育监管的语义与语用探微——以美国联邦政府教育监管为例 被引量:2

A Semantic and Pragmatic Study on Educational Supervision and Regulation——A Case from the US Federal Government
原文传递
导出
摘要 对2017年以来我国一系列教育文件内容分析发现,国家在主导推进"教育监管",但"监管"在教育领域尚属新概念。中、美的语义和语用研究结果互证,"教育监管"是对现行教育系统的渐进改良:发现教育问题,扭转无序现状,建章立制,优化管理。美国联邦政府历经百年发展、实践淘漉,建立了一套有关教育监管的科学政策工具,形成了规范的运行方式,以专业引领的行政合力为核心,以配套拨款和职责明确的监管法规为动力,建设高质量教育数据共享与交换平台支持科学决策,推动各州因地制宜的教育循证实践。从而成功实现了宏观顶层设计与微观教育实践之间的耦合联动,切实增强了联邦政府教育监管的系统效力。 The content analysis of the educational documents published on the website of China's Ministry of Education since 2017 found that the central government has been actively leading the promotion of"educational supervision and regulation",which remains a relatively new concept in the field of education.Semantic and pragmatic studies in China and the U.S.have all proved that"educational supervision and regulation"is able to improve the current education system gradually.The oversight and monitoring identify the problems;the management and control cope with the issues;the regulations and rule-making improve the administration.After more than a century of evolution,the U.S.federal government has developed a set of scientific policy instruments and operation modes that can realize the coupling between macro top-level design and micro educational practices.Based on the joint efforts of administrative power and professional leadership,driven by grants and regulations with clear accountability,the system is established upon evidence-based educational practices tailored to suit local conditions of each state with high-quality educational data sharing and exchange platforms to transmit information.It has successfully enhanced the effectiveness of educational supervision and regulation through soft power.
作者 徐梦杰 张民选 XU Mengjie;ZHANG Minxuan(Research Institute for International and Comparative Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234;Shanghai Research Center for Educational Supervision,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期86-95,共10页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部委托决策咨询项目“发达国家教育监管的实践与经验”(编号:JYBZFS2018105)的阶段性成果。
关键词 教育监管 教育规管 循证决策 美国 educational supervision educational regulation evidence-based decision making U.S.
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献18

  • 1马英娟.监管的语义辨析[J].法学杂志,2005,26(5):111-114. 被引量:48
  • 2马英娟.监管机构与行政组织法的发展——关于监管机构设立根据及建制理念的思考[J].浙江学刊,2007(2):14-21. 被引量:17
  • 3经济消息报编辑部.1995.诺贝尔经济学奖得主专录[M].北京:中国计划出版社:135.
  • 4斯蒂格利茨,沃尔什.2005.经济学:3版[M].黄险峰,张帆译.北京:中国人民大学出版社:38.
  • 5CLINTON B. 1993. Executive order 12866 : regulatory planning and review [R]. Fedend Register Presidential Documents, Vol. 58, October 4, FR 51735.
  • 6European Commission SEC(2005)791. 2006. Impact Assessment Guidelines [ R]. With 15 March update.
  • 7HAHN R. 1998. The cost and benefit of regulation [J]. American economic Beview, 12(4).
  • 8OECD. 1997. Regulatory impact analysis: best practices in OECD countries [ R]. Paris.
  • 9OECD. 2002. Report on regulatory reform: from interventionism to regulatory governance [R]. Paris.
  • 10POSNER E. 2001. Controlling agencies with cost -benefit analysis: a positive political theory perspective [J]. University of Chicago Law Review, 68(4).

共引文献44

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部