摘要
在国家监察委员会享有的监督、调查、处置三种职权中,调查权成为发现贪腐现象、查明腐败事实最常规且最有力的武器。但是,监察调查权在运行过程中存在监察调查权的性质之争、违法与犯罪的调查程序混同、监察措施适用不合比例等不协调之处。由此,出现法律体系内实体法、程序法在治理模式与治理效果上不一致的问题。因而,必须以世界各国对违法、犯罪制裁的模式为参考,探索监察调查权内部配置的合理架构模式,完成职务违法调查与职务犯罪调查程序的分离,提高监察权运行效率。
China National Supervisory Commission enjoys the three powers of supervision,investigation and disposal,of which the power of investigation becomes the most conventional and powerful weapon to detect the corruption and the fact of corruption.However,the power of supervision and investigation still witnesses incompatibilities,such as the disputes in the nature of the power of supervision and investigation,the confusion in the procedure of illegal and criminal investigation,and the disproportionate application of supervisory measures,which gives birth to inconsistency in governance modes and effects between the substantive law and procedural law in the legal system.Therefore,by using for reference the sanction models for lawbreaking and crimes in various countries,efforts must be made to explore reasonable structure models for the internal allocation of supervision and investigation power,separate the procedures of duty-related lawbreaking and crimes investigation and improve the efficiency of supervision power.
作者
马方
张升魁
MA Fang;ZHANG Sheng-kui(Southwest University for Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《广西警察学院学报》
2020年第6期1-11,共11页
Journal of Guangxi Police College
基金
2017年国家社科基金项目(17BFX005)
重庆市三特行动计划治安学特色专业建设项目(2019ZAST027)
西南政法大学总体国家安全观研究院项目(XS-ZTGJAQG-017)。
关键词
职务违法
职务犯罪
程序分置
措施分类
duty-related lawbreaking
duty-related crimes
procedures division
classification of measures
