摘要
对33个实质性解决行政争议样本案例的实证分析表明,司法审查广度的整体性、司法审查深度的一揽式和司法审查厚度的可接受性,共同构成了争议解决实质性与表层性的区分标准。人民法院经由依法裁判和多元协调化解方式的结合,并辅以其他审判机制的灵活运用,实现了行政审判由敷衍性司法向回应性司法的转向。行政争议实质性解决具有诉讼基本功能、司法能力表征和诉讼行为形态的三重属性,其真正实现有赖构建科学的行政审判绩效考评体系、提炼行政诉讼类型构造的具体规则、健全行政案件繁简分流的机制设计、区分适用宣告性判决和引领性判决、规范三类协调化解方式的梯度适用。行政争议实质性解决的理念践行和规范构造,有助于把我国行政审判制度优势更好转化为司法社会治理效能。
The empirical analysis of 33 sample cases of the substantive solution of administrative disputes shows that the integrity of judicial review’s breadth, the package solution of judicial review’s depth and the acceptability of judicial review’s thickness constitute the distinguishing standards between substantive and superficial aspects of dispute resolution. The people’s court has realized the transition from perfunctory justice to responsive justice in administrative litigation through the combination of adjudication according to law and multiple coordinated resolution methods, supplemented by the flexible use of other judicial mechanisms. The substantive solution of administrative disputes has triple attributes of basic functions of litigation, representation of judicial capabilities, and forms of litigation behavior. Its actual realization depends on the establishment of a scientific administrative litigation performance evaluation system, the refinement of specific rules for the construction of administrative litigation types, the sound mechanism design of complicated and streamlined administrative cases, the distinction between declaratory judgments and leading judgments, the gradient applicable norms of the three types of coordinated resolution methods. The practice of ideas and construction of norms of the substantive solution of administrative disputes help to better transform the advantages of China’s administrative trial system into the effectiveness of judicial social governance.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期122-141,共20页
China Legal Science
基金
司法部2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究重点课题“行政诉讼法修改后实施效果研究”(项目批准号:18SFB1003)的阶段性成果。
