摘要
基于《退耕还林工程社会经济效益监测与评价指标》行业标准,设计了成效评价调查表,对中西部16个省区2495户农户开展了问卷调查。依据农户作为“理性经济人”的理论假设,从农户的视角评价工程实施的情况、取得的成效、出现的问题,以期为巩固退耕还林成果、进一步扩大工程规模提供决策参考。结果显示,九成退耕农户的补助兑现及时,五成退耕农户补助已到期停发,农户对退耕补助的依赖性存在地区差异;退耕还林工程不仅改善了工程区的生态环境,还改善了农户家庭经营结构,促进劳动力向非农就业转移,助力贫困户脱贫,得到了大部分农户的认可和肯定。最后,分析了工程在退耕补助标准、退耕地经济收益等方面存在的问题,并提出了相应的对策和政策建议。
Based on the standard“index system of monitoring and assessment of social and economic impacts of Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program(CCFP)”,a questionnaire survey has been conducted and data collected from 2495 sampled farmer households of 16 provinces in central and western China.This paper describes the implementation,effectiveness and problems of CCFP from the perspective of farmers,so as to provide reference for decision making on how to maintain the achievements and expand the scale of CCFP.The results show that 90%of households have received subsidies on time,50%stopped receiving subsidy as the policy was due.And there are regional differences in households’dependence on CCFP subsidy.CCFP not only improved the ecological environment in the project area,but also improved farmers’family business structure,promoted the transfer of labor to non-agricultural employment,and helped poverty elimination.The effects of CCFP have been confirmed by most interviewees.Finally,this paper analyzes the problems of low subsidy standard and economic return of CCFP land,and proposes corresponding countermeasures and policy suggestions.
作者
周银花
胡延杰
张坤
ZHOU Yin-hua;HU Yan-jie;ZHANG Kun(Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing,100091,P.R.China;China National Forestry Economic Development Research Center,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing,100714,P.R.China)
出处
《北京林业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第4期16-23,共8页
Journal of Beijing Forestry University ：Social Sciences
基金
国家林业和草原局经济发展研究中心与北京林业大学、西南林业大学和甘肃农业大学合作的“退耕还林工程大学生农户调查”(JYC2018-102/JYC2018-103/JYC2018-98)。
关键词
退耕还林工程
扶贫
成效评价
农户调查
Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program
poverty alleviation
impact assessment
farmer households’survey
