期刊文献+

DWI和动态增强MRI在舌鳞状细胞癌诊断中的应用价值 被引量:1

The value of DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of tongue squamous cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨DWI和动态增强MRI在舌鳞状细胞癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经手术及病理证实的65例舌鳞状细胞癌患者,有颈部淋巴结转移的38例,无淋巴结转移的27例;其中55例患者行动态增强扫描。测量并比较有无淋巴结转移组间病变大小及表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC),分析病变的时间-信号强度曲线类型(time-intensity curve,TIC);同时比较不同T分期和病理分级舌鳞状细胞癌的ADC值差异。结果 65例舌鳞状细胞癌患者长径均值(28.2±11.7) mm,短径均值(17.7±9.4) mm,厚度均值(26.8±11.9) mm,ADC均值(1.029±0.142)×10-3mm2/s,有无颈部淋巴结转移组之间,病变的长径、短径、厚度以及ADC值的差异均有统计学意义。跨中线生长者更易发生淋巴结转移。55例行增强扫描的癌灶中,TIC曲线类型Ⅰ型(速升平台型)42例,Ⅱ型(速升流出型)13例。早期(T1+T2)舌癌组ADC值(1.090±0.113)×10-3 mm2/s,晚期(T3+T4)舌癌组ADC值(1.001±0.147)×10-3 mm2/s,组间差异有统计学意义。高分化、中分化及低分化鳞癌的ADC值分别为(1.101±0.101)×10-3 mm2/s、(0.992±0.139)×10-3 mm2/s和(0.819±0.125)×10-3 mm2/s组间差异有统计学意义;以1.011×10-3 mm2/s和0.928×10-3mm2/s分别为诊断高分化及低分化舌鳞癌的临界点,两者的敏感度及特异度分别为85.7%、63.3%和81.4%、83.3%。结论 DWI和动态增强MRI可较好反映舌鳞状细胞癌的特点,在对其定性、病理分级、分期及预测淋巴结转移等方面具有重要价值。 Objective To explore the value of diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Retrospective analysis of 65 patients with surgically and pathologically proven tongue squamous cell carcinoma, 38 with neck lymph node metastasis and 27 without lymph node metastasis;55 of 65 patients underwent dynamic contrast enhanced scanning. The size and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) of lesions between groups with or without lymph node metastasis were measured and compared. The time-intensity curves(TIC) of the lesions were analyzed and the parameters of tongue squamous cell carcinoma with different T stages and pathological grades were compared. Results The mean length diameter of tongue squamous cell carcinoma of 65 patients was(28.2 ± 11.7) mm, the mean short diameter was(17.7 ± 9.4) mm, the mean thickness was(26.8 ± 11.9) mm, and the ADC mean value was(1.029 ± 0.142) × 10-3 mm2/s. Between the groups with and without cervical lymph node metastasis, the differences of length diameter, short diameter, thickness and ADC value were statistically significant. Lymph node metastases are more likely to occur in patients with squamous cell carcinoma growing across the midline. Among the 55 cases with enhanced scanning, there were 42 cases of TIC curve type I(rapid ascending platform) and 13 cases of type II(rapid ascending outflow). ADC value(1.090 ± 0.113) × 10-3 mm2/s in the early(T1+T2) tongue cancer group and ADC value(1.001 ± 0.147) ×10-3 mm2/s in the advanced(T3+T4) tongue cancer group means statistically significant differences between the groups. The ADC values of highly differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma were(1.101 ± 0.101) 1 × 10-3 mm2/s,(0.992 ± 0.139) × 10-3 mm2/s and(0.819 ± 0.125) × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups. 1.011 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.928 × 10 × 10-3 mm2/s were served as cut-off points for the diagnosis of highly differentiated and poorly differentiated tongue squamous cell carcinoma, with sensitivity and specificity of 85.7%, 63.3% and 81.4%, and 83.3%, respectively. Conclusions DWI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI can better reflect the characteristics of tongue squamous cell carcinoma, which is of great value in its characterization, pathological grading, staging and prediction of lymph node metastasis.
作者 张瑞宗 李文武 邵硕 ZHANG Ruizong;LI Wenwu;SHAO Shuo(Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute,Shandong First Medical University,and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Jinan 250062 China;Department of Radiology,Jining No.1 People's Hospital)
出处 《中国辐射卫生》 2020年第6期686-690,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
关键词 舌鳞状细胞癌 ADC值 病理分级 分期 淋巴结转移 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Tongue ADC Values Pathological Grade Staging Lymphatic Metastasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献71

  • 1李金忠,李宁毅.cN0期头颈肿瘤哨位淋巴结活检术的研究进展[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2004,2(2):122-125. 被引量:2
  • 2[1]Yarbro JW,Page DL,Fielding LP,et al.American Joint Committee on cancer prognostic factors consensus conference[J].Cancer,1999,86:2436-2446.
  • 3[2]Alex JC,Sasaki CT,Krag DN,et al.Sentinel lymph node radiolocalization in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J].Laryngoscope,2000,110:198-203.
  • 4[3]Bostick PJ,Giuliano AE.Vital dyes in sentinel node localization[J].Semin Nucl Med,2000,30(1):18-25.
  • 5[4]Haddadin KJ,Soutar DA,Oliver R J,et al.Improved survival for patients with clinically T1/T2,N0 tongue tumors undergoing a prophylactic neck dissection[J].Head Neck,1999,21:517-525.
  • 6[5]Yuen AP,Wei WI,Wong YM,et al.Elective neck dissection versus observation in the treatment of early oral tongue carcinoma[J].Head Neck,1997,19:583-588.
  • 7[7]Morton DL,Wen DR,Wong JH,et al.Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma[J].Arch Surg,1992,127:392-399.
  • 8[8]Nieweg OE,Jansen L,Olmos RA,et al.Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer[J].Sur J Nucl Med,1999,26(Suppl):S11-S16.
  • 9[9]刘执玉.淋巴学[M].第2版,北京:中国医药科技出版社,2001:160.
  • 10[10]Stacker SA,Caesar C,Baldwin ME,et al.VEGF-D promotes the metastasis spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics[J].Nat Med,2001,7(2):186-191.

共引文献37

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部