摘要
[目的/意义]探讨用户在“豆瓣读书”发布短评的动机,尝试判断短评作为图书影响力的评估指标是否有效,以期为中文学术图书评价的Altmetrics指标建构提供参考。[方法/过程]以CBKCI统计报告公布的被引前十的古籍类中文学术图书为样本,采用扎根理论对样本图书在“豆瓣读书”网的1142条“短评”进行分析,探究短评的产生动机及相应短评数据的可用性。[结果/结论]用户产生短评的动机包括讨论、分享、消遣娱乐、外界压力、情感宣泄和资料获取6个主范畴。其中,“讨论”动机是最主要的动机,其两个子动机“表达与图书有关的个人经验或想法”和“表达对图书的见解或个人解释”占所有短评数据的四成以上,表明用户不是仅复制图书部分句子或章节,而是试图找到并传播图书最有价值的部分,此类短评数据可用以评价中文学术图书价值;而“分享”“消遣娱乐”“外界压力”“情感宣泄”和“资料获取”等动机相对来说难以较好地反映用户对图书的态度和认知,不宜纳入中文学术图书Altmetrics评价指标中。
[Purpose/significance]This paper discusses the users’motivation to publish short reviews on the Douban Reading platform,and tries to judge whether the short reviews are effective as indicators to evaluate the influence of books,so as to get inspiration for the indicator construction for Altmetrics to assess Chinese academic books.[Method/process]Taking the lop 10 cited books of ancient Chinese academic ones published in the CBKCI statistical report as samples,this paper used the grounded theory to analyze the 1,142“short comments”of the sample books on Douban Reading website,and explored the motivation of the short comments and its availability to assess the social influences of academic books.[Result/conclusion]6 main motivation for users to generate short reviews are identified,such as discussion,sharing entertainment,external pressure,emotional venting,and data acquisition.A-mong them,the“discussion”motivationis is the main one and its two sub-motivations“expressing personal experiences or ideas related to books”and“expressing opinions or personal explanations on books”account for more than 40%of all short review data.It indicates that most users do not only just copy a certain sentence or a certain chapter of a book,but try to find and spread the most valuable information of the book.Such short-review data can be used to evaluate Chinese academic books.Others motivation,such as“share”,“recreational entertainment”,“outside pressure”,“emotional vent”,and“data acquisition”,are relatively difficult to reflect well users’attitude and cognition about the books,and these data should not be included in the Altmetrics index to evaluate Chinese academic books.
作者
魏佳文
韩毅
Wei Jiawen;Han Yi(College of Computer and Information Science,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715)
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期98-106,共9页
Library and Information Service
基金
四川省社会科学规划重大课题“中文图书Altmetrics评价及其在四川哲学社会科学学科影响力分析中的应用”(项目编号:SC17EZD035)研究成果之一。
