摘要
律师的有效参与是认罪认罚从宽制度体系建构的重要基础,也是实现制度目的和立法意图的有效保障。律师作为认罪认罚从宽制度中的成员,拥有多重复合的角色定位:认罪认罚从宽制度的积极促进者,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的释明者,案件的实质参与者,认罪认罚从宽制度适用的监督者,该角色对制度的适用、推广、落实起着积极作用。认罪认罚从宽制度中律师参与的功能价值主要表现为:贯彻宽严相济刑事司法政策的重要保障,保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权益的根本需要,优化刑诉结构,构建平衡诉讼生态的重要举措。制度运行中,律师对自身介入的时间点,阅卷、会见等权利的享有和实现,量刑建议的有效参与以及责任承担等事项存在困惑或者欲而不能的情形。进一步完善认罪认罚从宽制度中的律师实质参与机制,保障律师的实质参与度、排除律师无责的可能,构建量刑协商程序的主动实质参与和完善值班律师制度,以实现认罪认罚的真实性、自愿性,从宽的合法性、正当性。
The effective participation of lawyers is an important basis for the construction of the leniency system for pleading guilty and punishment,and it is also an effective guarantee for the realization of the system and legislative intentions.As a member of the leniency system,lawyers have multiple roles.The roles include the positive promoter of the leniency system,the interpreter of the criminal suspect and defendant,the substantive participant of the case,and the supervisor of the application of the leniency system and these roles play a positive role in the application,promotion and implementation of the system.In the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment,the functional value of lawyers'substantive participation is mainly reflected in the important guarantee of implementing the criminal justice policy of combining justice with leniency,the fundamental need to protect the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants and the important measures to optimize the structure of criminal proceedings and build a balanced litigation ecology.In the operation of the system,lawyers are sometimes confused or unable to participate in the time of their own intervention,the enjoyment and realization of the rights of marking and interview,the effective participation of sentencing suggestions and the assumption of responsibility.China shall further improve the substantive participation mechanism of lawyers in the lenient system of pleading guilty and punishment,ensure the substantive participation of lawyers,eliminate the possibility that lawyers are not responsible,construct active substantive participation in sentencing negotiation procedures and improve the system of lawyers on duty in order to achieve the authenticity and voluntary nature of pleading guilty and punishment,and the legitimacy and appropriateness of leniency.
作者
浙江省湖州市人民检察院课题组
Research Group of the People's Procuratorate of Huzhou City of Zhejiang Province(People's Procuratorate of Huzhou City,Huzhou 313000,China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2020年第6期119-125,共7页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
2020年度浙江省湖州市人民检察院检察理论研究课题“认罪认罚从宽制度中律师实质参与”(2020浙湖检研041)。
关键词
认罪认罚从宽制度
值班律师
实质参与
量刑建议
Leniency System for Pleading Guilty and Punishment
Duty Lawyer
Substantial Participation
Sentencing Proposal
